Re: [TLS] TLS 1.3 - Support for compression to be removed

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Mon, 05 October 2015 04:12 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16A701B31B7 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Oct 2015 21:12:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZsggMKGFlwYZ for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Oct 2015 21:12:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yk0-x22a.google.com (mail-yk0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB0BA1B31C4 for <tls@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Oct 2015 21:12:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ykdz138 with SMTP id z138so159857701ykd.2 for <tls@ietf.org>; Sun, 04 Oct 2015 21:12:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=vLQcLAhfwFsoiGbb9Xj45eC0vE1Q8vIvoh10miqtvNk=; b=bnV1EvCGQ+snFQxAle5wrp+lMulpcsXuJdx1aclWydRp7fB8jHGfPPol4kTyjzbObn JkSbWold5SPDC2WDrzuwQKvezI+7WC+jR5YEO6/gMG2SWAOM+MGDRQ5ZqZG45QNK1v+T OlYi8A6izI735GCWMAWmhBPyJlFri4cng5ov9tpigDGk8PL0zJmjGqSEE/ubwJIlGFG6 mM0TC4inJoQdE4ZBd+g7XRaVqjHpqk7fohrhqUbbfTBUULceRtV3vuLsu3Ga7zp1+rB/ /lhyeDflInOGpxLSh62Uqz2CoZSAFpkzRrgzaAgySt/RY0LrIyruVsM/eVaYSBtcIP8z mCWg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.129.51.88 with SMTP id z85mr23657822ywz.148.1444018320093; Sun, 04 Oct 2015 21:12:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.13.230.78 with HTTP; Sun, 4 Oct 2015 21:11:59 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBOPd55SFGD13-jUsqLGOMxhEYbcrYcxdOQC2D39cJESGQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <79C632BCF9D17346A0D3285990FDB01AA3B9DAD8@HOBEX21.hob.de> <55FC5822.5070709@trigofacile.com> <77583acbe981488493fd4f0110365dae@ustx2ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com> <55FC7343.3090301@trigofacile.com> <6796F70E-44FD-4CD8-A691-6D0BFAE6EFDC@cs.meiji.ac.jp> <682cb934aeeb42fabdf1fecfccf4c5b5@ustx2ex-dag1mb3.msg.corp.akamai.com> <7E1B8B3D-DEF5-439A-8E56-0CB2DFC061A8@cs.meiji.ac.jp> <ED4C2E8B-3327-451E-8E59-D87705B935C8@gmail.com> <84faf2113b9946f79763886867d65925@ustx2ex-dag1mb3.msg.corp.akamai.com> <CAH8yC8=JcWo+4rtymKLCfs3aKFQmCc+C4jD0eb74jbfMLJFAaw@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBOD+jwFDaed6sqfBGabR1kpRjnAvAb5Pm9jCk43=s4Fzg@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnX_3VZZLb8HdM=zqLp70dsURM1gPiSZdE9nzDByaMkBzw@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBOPd55SFGD13-jUsqLGOMxhEYbcrYcxdOQC2D39cJESGQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2015 21:11:59 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnXddNbiy9Z2Oh4j0RzqRtwKQfBd=1qcO9k2itTL93082Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/wEMKM80MzejJcpQbee1S3kxeLOA>
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] TLS 1.3 - Support for compression to be removed
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2015 04:12:02 -0000

On 4 October 2015 at 21:06, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:
>
> Yes, if the attacker can provide their own data, it makes matters worse,
> but as the reference I provided indicated, there are potential security
> issues even if the attacker is not able to do so, provided that the data
> is sufficiently redundant.


Sometimes, it's OK.  Sometimes, not.  Agreed.