Re: [TLS] CWTs in TLS
Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com> Tue, 12 March 2019 18:42 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf@augustcellars.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F397131287 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 11:42:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ck5cOgEajKaQ for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 11:42:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail2.augustcellars.com (augustcellars.com [50.45.239.150]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22F6A13121E for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 11:42:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Jude (192.168.1.152) by mail2.augustcellars.com (192.168.1.201) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 11:42:05 -0700
From: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>
To: 'Hannes Tschofenig' <Hannes.Tschofenig@arm.com>, tls@ietf.org
References: <VI1PR0801MB21129C747FF3E6B882B5DD92FA490@VI1PR0801MB2112.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <VI1PR0801MB21129C747FF3E6B882B5DD92FA490@VI1PR0801MB2112.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 11:42:03 -0700
Message-ID: <008001d4d903$4a9b0670$dfd11350$@augustcellars.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0081_01D4D8C8.9E3CA3A0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQHj5w1U0IYuqY2+Ais/M7Kfrh2DcaXqOFeQ
Content-Language: en-us
X-Originating-IP: [192.168.1.152]
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/wFPiW1VSdkCPs8wYlHjA1CFe4WM>
Subject: Re: [TLS] CWTs in TLS
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 18:42:14 -0000
Coming out of the EDHOC discussions, I was thinking about doing this as well. I will definitely read it before Prague. Jim From: TLS <tls-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Hannes Tschofenig Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2019 1:59 AM To: tls@ietf.org Subject: [TLS] CWTs in TLS Hi all, I submitted a short document about the use of CBOR Web Tokens (CWTs) in TLS. The document is quite simple in the sense that it registers a new "certificate type" into an already existing registry. Here is the draft: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-tschofenig-tls-cwt-00 At the moment, this is a bit of an experiment. We hope to get some code size improvements over the use of X.509 certificates. Ciao Hannes & Mathias IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.
- [TLS] CWTs in TLS Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [TLS] CWTs in TLS Jim Schaad