[TLS] Re: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-mlkem-05 (Ends 2025-11-26)

Muhammad Usama Sardar <muhammad_usama.sardar@tu-dresden.de> Thu, 27 November 2025 07:59 UTC

Return-Path: <muhammad_usama.sardar@tu-dresden.de>
X-Original-To: tls@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: tls@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E05A91949AD; Wed, 26 Nov 2025 23:59:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=tu-dresden.de
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PpmTnkp4XSNT; Wed, 26 Nov 2025 23:59:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailout7.zih.tu-dresden.de (mailout7.zih.tu-dresden.de [141.76.32.220]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A2D191949A4; Wed, 26 Nov 2025 23:59:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tu-dresden.de; s=dkim2022; h=Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From:References:CC:To :Subject:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=ovQX3sN/kSzY9QZtHQ8U06t7sfJgBXk6Yrqu2Zxa0Qk=; b=cJxqeK4Z53nu1fZGMEegHnYwT5 sKgyH9+PljmCt1944SxhRNOBLy3KhkrEJggq3d0xCF56V2ybs+8+65R1O9Xaj/xPwrOWw4SUoatdP bgiNjItDaN0McrRAEXJ/+MJLLCLF6UaaPLAP4SoNFCxw9g4+0YBKQ9yxdZhR3RC0O3tccDtsu6sT3 sy271SCcv4XRDNX5eGlOQHmXynOUbL10VwGmgYd2uo5c8ywsv3frt1Uqj0SSL36taILyW4ll9D6gB KBSChQ6VPiLv1hUg5f5GdHWfluwT7qEoxsGY51blYErXoOGF5vMXt9gTfWCSRr7keoyNYBM1eWj+g ZOo+2wqg==;
Received: from msx-t422.msx.ad.zih.tu-dresden.de ([172.26.35.139] helo=msx.tu-dresden.de) by mailout7.zih.tu-dresden.de with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <muhammad_usama.sardar@tu-dresden.de>) id 1vOWuH-00AX6l-1a; Thu, 27 Nov 2025 08:59:17 +0100
Received: from [10.12.5.228] (141.76.13.165) by msx-t422.msx.ad.zih.tu-dresden.de (172.26.35.139) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.2562.29; Thu, 27 Nov 2025 08:59:12 +0100
Message-ID: <6ad0bc78-0b32-4782-bfe0-422a47ec80c1@tu-dresden.de>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2025 08:59:11 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
References: <20251126185919.362611.qmail@cr.yp.to> <9ce12b8e-9982-4194-987d-d2ca3a41ea48@tu-dresden.de> <CABcZeBOffkV9eUtpdPp8eWB_eMA1c6-GOMHoZcDs93cGm1kwfw@mail.gmail.com> <10352a8e-c3d5-457e-854d-e72e31fca2d2@tu-dresden.de> <CABcZeBPzabtzCs=zLncyjFy=JHWXzpPb6haN5iFA6=3orXTU2Q@mail.gmail.com> <91f28ee1-5408-417e-868d-bd5af47bd773@tu-dresden.de> <CABcZeBPopk4jSXjwWaX_bPdcgvj6f6wPxTc7+300YmZnLGf36A@mail.gmail.com> <b2593b36-4d8c-431c-ab79-a2dcf94dfe79@tu-dresden.de> <CABcZeBPV8n9AAaJB_r+cuXN3sxKRYN1u_GrZxkQoix_aegRkiA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Muhammad Usama Sardar <muhammad_usama.sardar@tu-dresden.de>
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBPV8n9AAaJB_r+cuXN3sxKRYN1u_GrZxkQoix_aegRkiA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-512"; boundary="------------ms060806070503070202030901"
X-ClientProxiedBy: MSX-L416.msx.ad.zih.tu-dresden.de (172.26.34.136) To msx-t422.msx.ad.zih.tu-dresden.de (172.26.35.139)
X-TUD-Virus-Scanned: mailout7.zih.tu-dresden.de
Message-ID-Hash: 47EOQAKEEDX7CRJMJQY2DMOYBNYPJTJD
X-Message-ID-Hash: 47EOQAKEEDX7CRJMJQY2DMOYBNYPJTJD
X-MailFrom: muhammad_usama.sardar@tu-dresden.de
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tls.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: draft-ietf-tls-mlkem@ietf.org, tls-chairs@ietf.org, tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [TLS] Re: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-mlkem-05 (Ends 2025-11-26)
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/weJvaTkVWn3Gd5zyRRIgSkHPMeI>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tls-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tls-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tls-leave@ietf.org>

On 27.11.25 01:16, Eric Rescorla wrote:

> First, the requirement is not that implementations *use* P-256 but
> rather that they implement it.
>
> What's *not* compliant is if you have an implementation which doesn't
> support P-256, no matter what other groups it supports.

Thank you for very precise explanations and clear examples. I fully 
agree that the statement I proposed is not required.

-Usama