Re: [TLS] Time to first byte vs time to last byte
Ben Smyth <research@bensmyth.com> Wed, 13 March 2024 15:44 UTC
Return-Path: <research@bensmyth.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C7CBC14EB17 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Mar 2024 08:44:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=bensmyth.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QYcEMMAY6HoG for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Mar 2024 08:44:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 7.smtp.34sp.com (7.smtp.34sp.com [46.183.8.237]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC737C14F6AD for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Mar 2024 08:44:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpauth5.mailarray.34sp.com (lvs5.34sp.com [46.183.13.73]) by 7.smtp.34sp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60556544079 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Mar 2024 15:44:22 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bensmyth.com; s=dkim; t=1710344662; bh=Jk+4aToOp59/rAZYcj69iQMSqpXYG0iwl0IuQ1qUxng=; h=References:In-Reply-To:Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc; b=FHwtFpXu7X5at4F2uM9qEzojdB29oArQTR6Sbv473u+kUyyHmg6zwwIok9BIJTSR/ ZuvSEyZCKBCg4t9YTv4BCIxlCyv27ApSbuKVIvLb7czSw7LzNcxVZ8GnCInsXEvMln 0BfGGSy6Btd+v9odK8g2W2lQKnFK2eEkpMXneQWw=
Received: from mail-pl1-f182.google.com ([209.85.214.182]:34095) by smtpauth5.mailarray.34sp.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <research@bensmyth.com>) id 1rkQmE-0002Ap-4l for tls@ietf.org; Wed, 13 Mar 2024 15:44:22 +0000
Received: by mail-pl1-f182.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1dda51bb52eso23682985ad.3 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Mar 2024 08:44:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUffPV2MYyldNNg7uoObxrvTk2TU1n7poLb7dDFEVtx6nLFU70mFv1HtC+u27NF/KDs3Pb3/ie6VPf11lg=
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yyews9ClibOLgEYY9samn2/nCUwD4PVJ0sGk/fw6KSyY8fpcER2 78b6LA/fAGA68jPQE8LG6DVuHE9I71C9Rj3+RfUKSiNVEFBBVfh383edcwzjMeBrKMzm0zkP06Z ohMnN/StEbFGSg1xF5nksvUnLLU0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHP6djrAAgrHM/MVm8tvfELJ8H/nw5UeWEVWXM0oYxEHjFFLLq5VawuQ5LN0QntaYvZqj2d0/ojPv6Ff6BzMr0=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:1103:b0:1dc:f91b:5e96 with SMTP id n3-20020a170903110300b001dcf91b5e96mr6078028plh.59.1710344660344; Wed, 13 Mar 2024 08:44:20 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAFR824zRjvC=+EoXXpVVZYVevrZeuudgTCCSp42wbbBu1NPBXA@mail.gmail.com> <CAF8qwaAd=k6YLUgcyh8QZOYy+rBrB8_SNxsWbDCExmO=aby6qQ@mail.gmail.com> <9e84358da9fb403a93416ae6d58d1917@amazon.com> <5c22bb70-cc6d-43c8-a02b-830a88480f24@betaapp.fastmail.com> <fefa9193dfac459d9b84ae49782ed9f0@amazon.com> <CAMjbhoXdhSZJjkWi=j6o0tUsnMbjTz72_45D+-ySm2mEmW7__g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMjbhoXdhSZJjkWi=j6o0tUsnMbjTz72_45D+-ySm2mEmW7__g@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: research@bensmyth.com
From: Ben Smyth <research@bensmyth.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 16:43:42 +0100
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CA+_8xu3ykwdg3toad4PJreXSSzBtPxAaMqC2QrAh7DWD=jyYZA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CA+_8xu3ykwdg3toad4PJreXSSzBtPxAaMqC2QrAh7DWD=jyYZA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bas Westerbaan <bas=40cloudflare.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: "Kampanakis, Panos" <kpanos=40amazon.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "TLS@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>, "Childs-Klein, Will" <childw@amazon.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ec76f006138ca52e"
X-Authenticated-As: f594447444afb5e8e542d6cd3ee989c5ad593da02deb40a8d61181d2a2c508bd
X-OriginalSMTPIP: 209.85.214.182
X-34spcom-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-34spcom-MailScanner-ID: 60556544079.A5977
X-34spcom-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-34spcom-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-6.11, required 6.5, autolearn=disabled, DKIM_SIGNED 0.10, DKIM_VALID -0.10, DKIM_VALID_AU -0.10, HTML_MESSAGE 0.00, SPF_PASS -0.00, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01, X34SP_ALLOW_GMAIL_EVEN_IF_BLACKLISTED -5.00, X34SP_OVERRIDE -1.00)
X-34spcom-MailScanner-From: research@bensmyth.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/wunm-NHhAs4lvUk-S3JhRn_k0CE>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Time to first byte vs time to last byte
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 15:44:43 -0000
On Sat, 9 Mar 2024 at 10:23, Bas Westerbaan <bas= 40cloudflare.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > Given that especially for the web, CDNs used much higher initcwnds, > > > Please, let us not assume every website is behind a CDN. > Isn't that assumption reasonable? At least for global websites --- without CDN performance sucks.
- [TLS] Time to first byte vs time to last byte Deirdre Connolly
- Re: [TLS] Time to first byte vs time to last byte Rob Sayre
- Re: [TLS] Time to first byte vs time to last byte David Benjamin
- Re: [TLS] Time to first byte vs time to last byte Kampanakis, Panos
- Re: [TLS] Time to first byte vs time to last byte Martin Thomson
- Re: [TLS] Time to first byte vs time to last byte Kampanakis, Panos
- Re: [TLS] Time to first byte vs time to last byte Bas Westerbaan
- Re: [TLS] Time to first byte vs time to last byte Ben Smyth
- Re: [TLS] [EXT] Re: Time to first byte vs time to… Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL
- Re: [TLS] [EXT] Re: Time to first byte vs time to… Ben Smyth
- Re: [TLS] [EXT] Re: Time to first byte vs time to… Rob Sayre
- Re: [TLS] [EXT] Re: Time to first byte vs time to… Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL
- Re: [TLS] [EXT] Re: Time to first byte vs time to… Kampanakis, Panos