Re: [TLS] TLS WG GitHub interaction

Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net> Thu, 22 October 2020 03:32 UTC

Return-Path: <mt@lowentropy.net>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4D573A00E3 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 20:32:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lowentropy.net header.b=lpMq0n/x; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=OEEU7GtE
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xCmkQvhOAazE for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 20:32:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85D783A00E0 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 20:32:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id D509AA82 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 23:31:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap10 ([10.202.2.60]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 21 Oct 2020 23:31:58 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lowentropy.net; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to :subject:content-type; s=fm3; bh=oWsTEqRFqNzHw7ToaC4xs7NJsqIgJ3+ r0jN5VzMA2n4=; b=lpMq0n/x0aPP66pPVOdIBcZF+Gh6kN7fh14fKFPXxGTtzu+ EhXy1pccUbwMGv7CL/AowVAhxdVPXAYsNv+ogu2o3t7LU/tbdc9Zjac2P+W7cmWW df5BDXjBTSNZNAjRtOsjAAEOgLN432YIkl6Ohj2XJArbSJctsjavXl3bbP9VsPbG HtuSxGG6eo3RDOxV1opt/eGWWwqvHjkjRb1f/h7P59yXbiz6cmN9D09FwQmPuJxy 1HpoCLqkYlkk8hcZZN5tpjvXMnRLUFGb2ojhSvDzHYDBKAiRBBro0xDm09zyqm8l wg5TrXQ3veMelk+MiphlJblf9p1GSWP+zB/7ryQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=oWsTEq RFqNzHw7ToaC4xs7NJsqIgJ3+r0jN5VzMA2n4=; b=OEEU7GtEHb1PxPTLZzOo27 XbRk4dOW79glViVuVLQSzOzu0blqdrlChC5ChNSNcNuFoivz1LMO6WTYKrbXd4Q3 ry05WvDXlzApX1ZUSJM4Vsck7cz4gcJf1DS+HkwHRO+9TC09KoWMTXE2mh6YkAne caewbfCAlJ1agfT+2CYdS1UbHai9c1zGdzI/43UUfUbUgpAMZKLDr/XlajySxVTX gKgiRxgNi4wakjtmmWrcMfjnZ2W/xW8mFdiXrcADRhhvBqd8dZ+DL8kteh5g9vHq qm0jLHANgH0CIiftbiJEn64Rz5nGGd/xYM3WODZnzx8HBfPsg1O0TPNpZ3hvpe/g ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:Lf2QXxSl9q4U2lycwT607XWdJj9IqxwxUlash9bmFKF6-9yZb-Y5WA> <xme:Lf2QX6xduuU-pSHRUsZlc2K8zy0Trta7_IeR9IklGzXZfNiRYX0feHsoZpjKel6W7 SyTjr2-bTpbTRUx0jE>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrjeeigdejtdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgesthdtre dtreertdenucfhrhhomhepfdforghrthhinhcuvfhhohhmshhonhdfuceomhhtsehlohif vghnthhrohhphidrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepkeetueeikedtkeelfeekve fhkeffvedvvefgkefgleeugfdvjeejgeffieegtdejnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgep tdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhhtsehlohifvghnthhrohhphidrnhgvth
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:Lf2QX23CcrrMhczSrrHGWwYx6aWaajOvlkVGxGivnjB2-VZkiZOezg> <xmx:Lf2QX5Ai6oQifYlcrWUsEzclRrMlMchNFPe0tUmbuyleTHKkeQDoYw> <xmx:Lf2QX6jbwetcEJ8Z0_IPKMD8ZDMfDp0Dqf8iRE8xSgJNihDj77HArg> <xmx:Lv2QX1seh5K4fAYmVuvq8BsVYD-KCK0a--3HTH63asM0yKVajPooiQ>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 21B8A20075; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 23:31:57 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.3.0-529-g69105b1-fm-20201021.003-g69105b13
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <950d9aea-9758-4964-bd38-5c00e686afd2@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAChr6Sw2p_D=cBYC=kk4tPz05TwvKQ9c5a59AqO763R6RxMbXQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <ca1ba518-7195-415a-8729-3ce60724f5ff@www.fastmail.com> <CAChr6Sw2p_D=cBYC=kk4tPz05TwvKQ9c5a59AqO763R6RxMbXQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 14:31:38 +1100
From: "Martin Thomson" <mt@lowentropy.net>
To: tls@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/xYQzm89x-exJKfZY8unuq0QIJtI>
Subject: Re: [TLS] TLS WG GitHub interaction
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 03:32:02 -0000

On Thu, Oct 22, 2020, at 10:04, Rob Sayre wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 3:51 PM Christopher Wood <caw@heapingbits.net> wrote:
> > 
> > We'd like to hear whether folks are support or oppose this proposal. Please chime in (on the list!) and share your thoughts before November 4. We'll determine whether there is consensus to adopt this new approach moving forward at that time.

This is a fine plan.

> I support this "issue discussion mode" as long as summaries are sent to 
> the list (as they are now). My github account is too noisy to be 
> useful. 

I think that Rob's request is reasonable.  And I hope that this isn't just the digests, which I find useless.  Either way, even when discussing issues, it's often good to open a thread on the list for important topics.

On this point, I regard the ECH work as being effectively a self-selected design team.  I have been unable to keep tracking the work and lack the context to engage on the topics that do come back to the list for discussion.  Missing 3am meetings can't have helped, but it's mostly about the volume of traffic.