IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] Security review of TLS1.3 0-RTT

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Wed, 03 May 2017 04:43 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18ED6128B4E for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 May 2017 21:43:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9k1UeGTuVyiu for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 May 2017 21:43:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x232.google.com (mail-yw0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96850129418 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 May 2017 21:41:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x232.google.com with SMTP id k11so79540407ywb.1 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 02 May 2017 21:41:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Aalde8G2Cn1NJf9GqwY8B4zYPniq5vh1FK0h+pfYyIU=; b=hgjdFLp+mUeAbvqTyNrgybNSBr8GJEECTvxqK2xpNIqMoL8eoJuNnlK09lBOIP0XpL y4qK2xmn0jMIP5nRE7tHzcSWRLqZKYoGpxFU/D6ekw8u6EtFWLztvbAzAJ8vGBTz5a4b jQ9XPdK2pdFMmc8GSg4QMbyRH7UT8Kp1GsuGOmnH37NkCA/Sz+lDI5gAEXnKAD7nKOqV z+wBm8pXgJyt3na2PrCqk3lmHa8/mFWf1NaffiewlIlEJRMhkXxl9z6J7ITUGfPRyd31 Ut0tyJREQpoBZAd9/O0Hbq2PsgLfUaJk2HqX6gSX2JjvRoZSiz5D92ns8pk+6sAtD+EH DLVw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Aalde8G2Cn1NJf9GqwY8B4zYPniq5vh1FK0h+pfYyIU=; b=M3HV6mBs+5K/EvthNoo2K3/iV2MxJhWiiBlPccQDiAUkEapTk12YA3ZbOzsYBPlH9P UQyVM32yBcPhcQJs/FdADckd2t9BztRAhEyF2UxUEok3yhlB6zxku9iqVpFAAXifzpMo 2NbwXhBgmypZWzagaeOns/U0ZQZYZxGzyBoW2ZrwTYcjuGC2kaHTNtWQTNVOaaWq49v8 t632kDhO8sGOptgx3P/st45+U2eILIZNqmJGpcoa14jfWoWJoFfZXUbfm2v7zJWzNzZ3 0qA2Ukf1ZwtMkB12/Pg5HPLRhE1QtvKjXgYc8K7Avej3FMg+U2xp8Vm1grRFE9FXHXTm wl1w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/5KsV1SGay94MdMwHWOy5zhPsuJ9zubb5tZV9fZpBOJZd5gvlCd lC+b60UpwwM9UercWAfvMsx0U2gYuZW6
X-Received: by 10.129.52.141 with SMTP id b135mr27601930ywa.85.1493786500831; Tue, 02 May 2017 21:41:40 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.129.113.7 with HTTP; Tue, 2 May 2017 21:41:00 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20170503042227.GN10188@localhost>
References: <20170502192003.GH10188@localhost> <e313032d-2ac8-cc4e-0aa7-de869007e397@akamai.com> <20170502193145.GI10188@localhost> <42522b3c-8987-ea2a-2173-bcadaf6ff326@akamai.com> <20170502195753.GJ10188@localhost> <87a86vrnge.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> <20170502212953.GK10188@localhost> <CABcZeBNvFAe+otDgE6rMG0wGaBA=Z3bDBRRvirxPFJFuc+KbeQ@mail.gmail.com> <20170502230258.GL10188@localhost> <CABcZeBMHPi3dJQRuxU_y5E=NPYpYEwikBxjXPUVw4m2WSjWrWw@mail.gmail.com> <20170503042227.GN10188@localhost>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Tue, 02 May 2017 21:41:00 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBPpYGCzeOwv-FmJSvaJVJKKMjNh75g1Eptoyr9pfRe1DQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
Cc: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>, TLS WG <tls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11408984c0cf88054e9745bd"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/xgRpmTtFKQ8FssYdGiInObNkpZc>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Security review of TLS1.3 0-RTT
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 May 2017 04:43:22 -0000

On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 9:22 PM, Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> wrote:

> On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 04:41:52PM -0700, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> > On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
> wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 03:53:48PM -0700, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> > > > It's not XOR. It's addition mod 2^32. That's important because the
> > > > *difference*
> > > > between the ticket replay times is directly observable anyway.
> > >
> > > Computationally there's no real difference between that and XOR.
> >
> > What information do you believe you are gathering here?
>
> I believe the attack described is finding the time of the session's
> establishment.


Hmm.... Can you walk me through how you think that works?

-Ekr


>

Nico
> --
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email