Re: [TLS] DH generator 2 problem?

Michael D'Errico <mike-list@pobox.com> Fri, 09 October 2020 19:15 UTC

Return-Path: <mike-list@pobox.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D2193A147C for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 12:15:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.b=gRRww221; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=FRdNaYNs
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7UYDny0yC3r2 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 12:15:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A25CC3A147D for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 12:15:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 268DD601 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 15:15:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap21 ([10.202.2.71]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 09 Oct 2020 15:15:52 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pobox.com; h= mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to :subject:content-type; s=fm1; bh=/xrUiKhMAkOj91obUU8Izu3aXbr/Bk1 Ns/Z45AEqgJc=; b=gRRww221QD3JDlIhOqWJMndj7AD6N3QZi9kPuYu7gq/lXTE 1zM0F/5SSJhoHV3B67JfGE6IJP42DFxOdqC5edcMcC0IqKuC9nT9vxkUFYKWtNuj 2sBQbzVuIa5JuNnXFWRfRc2s2T9QGFTPQNUF45s2EFsYTMOgGWYmaxgz5ei7GwHD GdXwlQ55aG5inviC8e6dXCQhcUffB/pALO+a6MLJrpM1Kr/4dIglpEVJ8Z4wQLY1 zs/p7cCXcphv+VqlKEVhqBWwmgIOcBfqePs4UJiU1BJsyPgxAV/Qd21rqEHDAv7f vk+F0OfHTnyK0CUcIjbuRwv4Ac99rJxWlT5nScw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=/xrUiK hMAkOj91obUU8Izu3aXbr/Bk1Ns/Z45AEqgJc=; b=FRdNaYNsfQe8R9imN0+iRB vvhlDXD+31oHva+6JH6cG8nPXOT7CRa2DoPM2Uu7/XW8LV5EwPKVBPYtqrFHUS/p taTBvMdb093YP4OnDjMLavfTZzvSinTNDH/P5KmhcpdZfGbgfpxTB4Ug4FF8kfyd uKNzy517W7WNiL0Bmm8jPSAcfdPGBeVrDaAC5lEhUufu4GAZ7M6LHtZDndTm7nky QlmEnjQ1dbsIxi8N7DyjDhTbY9D41sT34UMndAmPf2agkTa7YcAz6ZsWL9BV6M67 AoQvOodlomCRZBwyF/bmGxDFD2bFOO5cRBt+TrA1aZvngByUAl+qs/8vjJDxkBJQ ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:57aAX4t8nmdnXpzpTCwgxpux1fL4VWV4JvEOECeExSNDPc0FF7Y3vQ> <xme:57aAX1cFeiRWj43V6nF8newli2Jbw5kuOZjmXMFGeJ0f7H-6TZngdgCSeHP7aAkDx LvogUHD4ngOoumzeg>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrhedugddufeejucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvufgtsehttd ertderredtnecuhfhrohhmpedfofhitghhrggvlhcuffdkgfhrrhhitghofdcuoehmihhk vgdqlhhishhtsehpohgsohigrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeevudevueehhf evkeevudfhueeggfeivdfhtdekheeuhefhieeuvefgjeffgedtueenucffohhmrghinhep ihgvthhfrdhorhhgnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilh hfrhhomhepmhhikhgvqdhlihhsthesphhosghogidrtghomh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:57aAXzzIVH5YgumOGnN-Cdjmkm2so1HMVOd8lXsRCBmtn8Z53SscxQ> <xmx:57aAX7OVMtoGXJDl0-G9HrCS2b35ANG4Zio-hgwslHXit9HJZ6fykA> <xmx:57aAX49TUNGUbagOm-43JX1tLgqgQYn12vAx8vJgRqtjLjpgOtyPJg> <xmx:57aAX7LNL6yv_68wnV82Ptl5V7QPqM6RYJVbIYh9NtAlJdcTDQrdjA>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 5FBFC660069; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 15:15:42 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.3.0-407-g461656c-fm-20201004.001-g461656c6
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <925a33a2-692f-4bfc-9088-691faaaf4ad4@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <987cc58c-84e3-4413-b2f8-ae177a39ed14@www.fastmail.com>
References: <d876f953-2d5a-40a4-5738-b2bc24705f2c@pobox.com> <dd15bfa7-f5d7-47c3-9ce8-caf6a445fdce@www.fastmail.com> <CACsn0ckwoMmq9ioBe4D9fPVCWai_4w2UfZWS1m1qi5xfh0h2zQ@mail.gmail.com> <3765fb3c-fe5f-10cc-5c82-bc8d3c20d2cd@pobox.com> <987cc58c-84e3-4413-b2f8-ae177a39ed14@www.fastmail.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2020 15:15:05 -0400
From: "Michael D'Errico" <mike-list@pobox.com>
To: tls@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/xnELaCIjmpZwo1DdIhTUCdaSWVE>
Subject: Re: [TLS] DH generator 2 problem?
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2020 19:15:56 -0000

> This is a reminder to keep discourse here courteous and respectful.

I am hoping this comment was not directed at me.
I find myself biting my tongue frequently, but will
try to do a better job of it going forward in any
case.

> We want this mailing list to be maximally useful for all readers. 
> Dismissive or otherwise disrespectful replies are counter to that goal. 
> Please check out the official Code of Conduct [1] for more information.
> 
> Michael, since your question is more related to the cryptographic 
> primitives used by TLS than the protocol itself, the chairs encourage 
> you to continue this discussion on the CFRG mailing list [2]. 

I am not really interested in pursuing this further.
If the cryptographers want to run with it, that's
fine.  I'm more of a protocol implementer person
and will refocus my attention there, or not, haven't
decided.

Mike


> Thanks,
> Chris, on behalf of the chairs
> 
> [1] https://ietf.org/about/administration/policies-procedures/code-of-conduct/
> [2] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cfrg/