IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] Cached Info extension - Draft 01

Florian Weimer <fweimer@bfk.de> Wed, 01 July 2009 07:11 UTC

Return-Path: <fweimer@bfk.de>
X-Original-To: tls@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 935243A6EBE for <tls@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 00:11:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.741
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.741 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.508, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XcDpE8O7zmBQ for <tls@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 00:11:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx01.bfk.de (mx01.bfk.de [193.227.124.2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0EDC3A68E7 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 00:11:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx00.int.bfk.de ([10.119.110.2]) by mx01.bfk.de with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) id 1MLu1E-0006Aj-BL; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 09:14:12 +0200
Received: by bfk.de with local id 1MLtyP-00071H-JC; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 07:11:17 +0000
To: Stefan Santesson <stefan@aaa-sec.com>
References: <C670849E.2E64%stefan@aaa-sec.com>
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@bfk.de>
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 07:11:17 +0000
In-Reply-To: <C670849E.2E64%stefan@aaa-sec.com> (Stefan Santesson's message of "Wed\, 01 Jul 2009 03\:12\:30 +0200")
Message-ID: <82ws6s27ze.fsf@mid.bfk.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org>, tls@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [TLS] Cached Info extension - Draft 01
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 07:11:06 -0000

* Stefan Santesson:

> One difficulty I have is that I don't see, and never have seen, the reason
> to provide different levels of hash algorithms for a usage that does not
> require a strong hash.

Why do you think this doesn't need a strong hash?

-- 
Florian Weimer                <fweimer@bfk.de>
BFK edv-consulting GmbH       http://www.bfk.de/
Kriegsstraße 100              tel: +49-721-96201-1
D-76133 Karlsruhe             fax: +49-721-96201-99

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email