[TLS] Re: Ketan Talaulikar's No Objection on draft-ietf-tls-tls12-frozen-07: (with COMMENT)
Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Mon, 09 June 2025 15:15 UTC
Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: tls@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: tls@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38F2D32B5054 for <tls@mail2.ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Jun 2025 08:15:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V5ghvTZCWgqD for <tls@mail2.ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Jun 2025 08:15:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yb1-xb36.google.com (mail-yb1-xb36.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b36]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DC0A32B5044 for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Jun 2025 08:15:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yb1-xb36.google.com with SMTP id 3f1490d57ef6-e75668006b9so4205471276.3 for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 09 Jun 2025 08:15:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1749482125; x=1750086925; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=IeInG9gpk/jYxuZLYo4GGNlwEltm3AqV6kAGSt1wqDc=; b=DybkrflA2c+NLCLeU7M5O7Wj9SiA5A2xKRURcV46Gt8L81AhjWOb35MtI2Junb9Lpu Zbn85O0pt5vgQa4P7WwJlbI6+IaWb3W04RgMERXu0Clxde+dUiiYNd4tLdlze7mLhCu5 ZogU3B4lmrtyZ1BO1Gor1R/epxMVDGZ3tVXY7Gii2IItfJeMBLKEVdFr78f1i1b00tqy 654cskTufVT3+u/+mHuKUokSYpCCPCKgJumCTUWslrvQr9MxGB3HOkagtWQYWorV9HRj pKEN3Pex00FfvA5ejqR4IZE6YxBwKP2KcY0rEWLxh2dCAH5v6Is4eo4/tfij/1Un0Y8G vdSw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1749482125; x=1750086925; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=IeInG9gpk/jYxuZLYo4GGNlwEltm3AqV6kAGSt1wqDc=; b=PNZfPzx9YEBBV5t0nQ/1YSrScXlKRLIeV1S178G19AmHEqye8QtA3fRkSbP+V6ZXn3 KQl4vtSi4cfH8ozaenezxgDRO5N72qM4rAbjvyJ753vTNkxG8MQITE0uazkUkKgZlGA5 oTAyPL/G5LaVkWpuss4xeqHbEHBV0Bz5CqGj6n4KygtS4J5H6NsmNWAHCfBtnzClUqPl kIxSGntYDCsIYngdzs+GIAy6UAMDo5RQwXhG1OobEtA0rBiozMcapH+5ujKoJcncemj+ bNprHCbnB0Ka5dEvRx4HWTsFH5jaX5deY4IMP9rlV1EHQoCp9nMMOlWr+Y3pN/f9j/tK tZnA==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXhtfVDTiGwraWleSDfYUmnKKrtTRqBnd5+TNZzZl4wjjerFRbDdMuPBtkuBea9yLlO75c=@ietf.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yz6JP+Ll+dUd+Cv7PSYvH/QAdYswAHKdf5cP4dqSnANNOcAWimH jgxpz8/0ic8IiXquVPs8zqdin+4k1OWUm0PWDdoRLUvBvG+H+pnlUXVh3m5e1W7n+E3t55CzOuz gyGIKQPkvn2bMDATm3vilq7qPIDnGlQItgHVAY83D5w==
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncsVZAOSF+k8JQWv5kN6eBt2U+++C4uHwwNgJsh0G6rLdzTZnkVxVfse2YkrjQL hZz046ggJFIXgCKn4adhwmlqfpQiOfSEkYx0VrqYCnmbfYV0FQr8T3ufdlO+PCej6E627BfnIup Oqvmf7+GU1y19D9qCiLEjyaYKGUdOZEwxbG0g3j2Gsf2TCQ7Dh1Ej6yUDbW85nmaern9rjb83EJ K9h
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEtYn9ACjtZUc78diXpYTrDd3aweodbS1YK2KpztscSchs5dJi4otZ0GDkLT33464qwh3/UqbrmevXxpCj2SNE=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6902:2686:b0:e81:cfde:3d46 with SMTP id 3f1490d57ef6-e81cfde4149mr9386915276.16.1749482124965; Mon, 09 Jun 2025 08:15:24 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <a6dfaeec1f3f412a9231fe0ad0d9881c@bofa.com> <CABcZeBOpH1pMYWzRS=qNmOKbFQTA+CxCUQ2CcKBMsvS0xMsn2Q@mail.gmail.com> <ME0P300MB0713D6E2282DE1B36F273AA6EE69A@ME0P300MB0713.AUSP300.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <CABcZeBNd+L0N3gcXBOPwN-E-e68QDb5G1SDCTHMKCG=PkWmiBg@mail.gmail.com> <ME0P300MB0713C94AF94ED149C8ED034FEE6BA@ME0P300MB0713.AUSP300.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
In-Reply-To: <ME0P300MB0713C94AF94ED149C8ED034FEE6BA@ME0P300MB0713.AUSP300.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2025 08:14:47 -0700
X-Gm-Features: AX0GCFtTEwj8lhbkxRtGNiRU30vtbR5MIZ61Ucl2-O6jKzZC_DmYJ8AOiN5vebc
Message-ID: <CABcZeBOM=B_HJmccc8WHyAy77ZmtA313mx8CcV41PifOboHT=A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Peter Gutmann <pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000998b960637250c3c"
Message-ID-Hash: HVWEKVMWEUVJ7BZ6ASXMXEOANCJDIEKV
X-Message-ID-Hash: HVWEKVMWEUVJ7BZ6ASXMXEOANCJDIEKV
X-MailFrom: ekr@rtfm.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tls.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: "Arano, Edward" <edward.arano=40bofa.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [TLS] Re: Ketan Talaulikar's No Objection on draft-ietf-tls-tls12-frozen-07: (with COMMENT)
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/y1qgah_U8-vTivpIXSk6oqkilE8>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tls-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tls-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tls-leave@ietf.org>
Once again, I see you've decided to engage in a bit of selective quoting and misstating what I said in order to feed your particular hobby horse. My position simply isn't that the Web is the only use of TLS, but I doubt anything I say will disabuse you of your misimpression. -Ekr On Mon, Jun 9, 2025 at 6:29 AM Peter Gutmann <pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz> wrote: > Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> writes: > > >This is a somewhat clearly unspecified set, and in the first sentence > (which > >you trimmed for some reason), I explicitly express some concern about this > >ambiguity. > > That's not really helping your case. The bit I cut (the OP's text and the > start of yours) to avoid quoting a huge block of text never mentioned the > web, > or anything else specific, but adding that to the quoted text would > emphasise > even more that you responded to a nonspecific comment with a reply that > assumed that nothing apart from the web exists. Your "explicitly expressed > concern" just says "I assume everyone's using a web browser" ("Under the > assumption you mean "our customers", then those people are probably coming > in > via a Web browser") which is exactly the point I was making: The > assumption is > that if someone is using TLS then it must be web use. Nothing else gets > any > consideration, and the WG has been like that for years (with a token > acknowledgement of use by telcos because they're big enough that you can't > really ignore them). > > Peter. >
- [TLS] Re: Ketan Talaulikar's No Objection on draf… Ketan Talaulikar
- [TLS] Re: Ketan Talaulikar's No Objection on draf… Deb Cooley
- [TLS] Ketan Talaulikar's No Objection on draft-ie… Ketan Talaulikar via Datatracker
- [TLS] Re: Ketan Talaulikar's No Objection on draf… Arano, Edward
- [TLS] Re: Ketan Talaulikar's No Objection on draf… Salz, Rich
- [TLS] Re: Ketan Talaulikar's No Objection on draf… Ketan Talaulikar
- [TLS] Re: Ketan Talaulikar's No Objection on draf… Salz, Rich
- [TLS] Re: Ketan Talaulikar's No Objection on draf… Salz, Rich
- [TLS] Re: Ketan Talaulikar's No Objection on draf… Deb Cooley
- [TLS] Re: Ketan Talaulikar's No Objection on draf… Salz, Rich
- [TLS] Re: Ketan Talaulikar's No Objection on draf… Ketan Talaulikar
- [TLS] Re: Ketan Talaulikar's No Objection on draf… Eric Rescorla
- [TLS] Re: Ketan Talaulikar's No Objection on draf… Salz, Rich
- [TLS] Re: Ketan Talaulikar's No Objection on draf… Arano, Edward
- [TLS] Re: Ketan Talaulikar's No Objection on draf… Peter Gutmann
- [TLS] Re: Ketan Talaulikar's No Objection on draf… Salz, Rich
- [TLS] Re: Ketan Talaulikar's No Objection on draf… Watson Ladd
- [TLS] Re: Ketan Talaulikar's No Objection on draf… Eric Rescorla
- [TLS] Re: Ketan Talaulikar's No Objection on draf… David Benjamin
- [TLS] Re: Ketan Talaulikar's No Objection on draf… Peter Gutmann
- [TLS] Re: Ketan Talaulikar's No Objection on draf… Eric Rescorla
- [TLS] Re: Ketan Talaulikar's No Objection on draf… Eric Rescorla
- [TLS] Re: Ketan Talaulikar's No Objection on draf… Peter Gutmann
- [TLS] Re: Ketan Talaulikar's No Objection on draf… Kathleen Moriarty
- [TLS] Re: Ketan Talaulikar's No Objection on draf… Watson Ladd
- [TLS] Re: Ketan Talaulikar's No Objection on draf… Achim Kraus
- [TLS] Re: Ketan Talaulikar's No Objection on draf… Martin Thomson
- [TLS] Re: Ketan Talaulikar's No Objection on draf… Kathleen Moriarty