Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-deprecate-09.txt> (Deprecating TLSv1.0 and TLSv1.1) to Best Current Practice
Christian de Larrinaga <cdel@firsthand.net> Sat, 05 December 2020 11:50 UTC
Return-Path: <cdel@firsthand.net>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD05D3A0147; Sat, 5 Dec 2020 03:50:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.319
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.319 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=firsthand.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rajBiFlL2tTt; Sat, 5 Dec 2020 03:50:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tranquility.default.cdelarrinaga.uk0.bigv.io (tranquility.default.cdelarrinaga.uk0.bigv.io [IPv6:2001:41c8:51:8b8::184]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 252EE3A011B; Sat, 5 Dec 2020 03:50:57 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=firsthand.net; s=tranquility; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:In-reply-to:Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:References; bh=ixlEKVTgTuURG+tEu0vfZfcJcJxNaWGYIvcxfFBPPrI=; b=DSPamYNGKnWpMN/GQe5DB4UYkwIlC8UA1qpHwiZQpc5SkxYqYPZ/a+Tv0Jo1KrWXDI47SdiPPWZME4ESg4Bydv8e1P6r3jWIT1Ijz+9NXDh0IRcetm2EDneK4euDCXslDbUgE0RXCmwKj0LrxaPQ7+44R4zm9rBXXwxykJG3y0o=;
Received: from 60.88.155.90.in-addr.arpa ([90.155.88.60] helo=christian-yoga) by tranquility.default.cdelarrinaga.uk0.bigv.io with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <cdel@firsthand.net>) id 1klW5V-0007oO-6e; Sat, 05 Dec 2020 11:50:53 +0000
References: <251c6be9-ce1b-b358-0c72-03a61db5a60d@foobar.org> <05935A0A-B503-4C77-9AB0-F82B333C7168@fugue.com> <a76f1d07-32ce-fcb9-3e79-fee77a6c57de@foobar.org>
User-agent: mu4e 1.5.5; emacs 28.0.50
From: Christian de Larrinaga <cdel@firsthand.net>
To: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
Cc: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>, tls@ietf.org, "Ackermann, Michael" <MAckermann@bcbsm.com>, last-call@ietf.org
Reply-To: cdel@firsthand.net
In-reply-to: <a76f1d07-32ce-fcb9-3e79-fee77a6c57de@foobar.org>
Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2020 11:50:01 +0000
Message-ID: <875z5gxyja.fsf@firsthand.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/y29WV_Thjwp8L1kG_B21WkIi_Kk>
Subject: Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-deprecate-09.txt> (Deprecating TLSv1.0 and TLSv1.1) to Best Current Practice
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2020 11:51:00 -0000
Nick Hilliard writes: > > What's relevant to the IETF is that it needs to make sound technical > recommendations about the usability and appropriateness of standards. > If organisations choose not to keep supporting some or all of their > product lines, this shouldn't impact the IETF's ability to do its job. > > Nick However governments are busy writing up standards for managing the secure deployment of devices. The UK's DCMS has been working on this for a couple of years The local ISOC chapter has been engaging on this. On that count IETF participants might like to keep engaged with those ISOC chapter liaisons? Who I'm sure would be grateful for informed input as well. As a general observation the issue of vendors falling away from supporting devices is at odds with the promoted market model of licensing IPR and maintaining restrictions over IPR after support falls away. Unless that IPR becomes public domain - or opened at least in regards the scope of empowering the right to repair etc. The practicalities of that is something IETF can think through as part of its IPR policies? Another observation is that manufacturer/vendors who force updates on their devices will tend to consider their own devices not others which in context of "IoT" are very likely to also be interoperating from other vendors or FOSS / hardware. That creates space for lots of stools for security to fall between. The issues around interoperability also means serving the responsibility of user administrators across whatever pool of vendors or FOSS supply chains they choose to deploy and commission support. Depending entirely on each vendor you use has never been a good idea if you want a functional system. So specifications to serve interoperability in terms of securing real world installations of devices running from a selection of IETF defined protocols is something IETF can think about too? For discussion? I would expect that thinking to not assume "vendor" lock in but empower user administrated support in concert with vendor support (if chosen (not imposed)) as long as that is available and faciitate open alternatives particularly when that falls away. This also seems a point where IETF specifications can offer guidance. C -- Christian de Larrinaga
- [TLS] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-depr… The IESG
- Re: [TLS] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-… tom petch
- Re: [TLS] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [TLS] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-… tom petch
- Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [TLS] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-… Sean Turner
- Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [TLS] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-… Keith Moore
- Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-… Keith Moore
- Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [TLS] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-… Gary Gapinski
- Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-… Keith Moore
- Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-… Keith Moore
- Re: [TLS] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-… Eliot Lear
- Re: [TLS] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [TLS] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [TLS] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-… Nick Lamb
- Re: [TLS] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-… Martin Duke
- Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-… Peter Gutmann
- Re: [TLS] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-… Peter Gutmann
- Re: [TLS] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-… Keith Moore
- Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [TLS] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-… Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-… Ben Smyth
- Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-… Peter Gutmann
- Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-… Keith Moore
- Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-… Salz, Rich
- Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-… Salz, Rich
- Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-… Peter Gutmann
- Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-… Eliot Lear
- Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-… Salz, Rich
- Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-… Olle E. Johansson
- Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-… STARK, BARBARA H
- Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-… Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL
- Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-… STARK, BARBARA H
- Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-… Peter Gutmann
- Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-… Eliot Lear
- Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-… Peter Gutmann
- Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-… Eliot Lear
- Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-… Keith Moore
- Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-… Salz, Rich
- Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-… Ackermann, Michael
- Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-… Salz, Rich
- Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-… Ted Lemon
- Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-… Ted Lemon
- Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-… STARK, BARBARA H
- Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-… Bill Frantz
- Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-… Ted Lemon
- Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-… Joe Abley
- Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-… Ackermann, Michael
- Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-… Eliot Lear
- Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-… STARK, BARBARA H
- Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-… Ted Lemon
- Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-… Ackermann, Michael
- Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-… Gary Gapinski
- Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-… Watson Ladd
- Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-… STARK, BARBARA H
- Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-… BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A
- Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-… Ackermann, Michael
- Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-… Rob Sayre
- Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-… Rob Sayre
- Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-… Ackermann, Michael
- Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-… Rob Sayre
- Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-… BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A
- Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-… Ackermann, Michael
- Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-… Ackermann, Michael
- Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-… Andrew Campling
- Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-… Ted Lemon
- Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-… tom petch
- Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-… Ted Lemon
- Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-… Ackermann, Michael
- Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-… Ted Lemon
- Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-… Ackermann, Michael
- Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-… Nick Hilliard
- Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-… Ted Lemon
- Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-… Rob Sayre
- Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-… Nick Hilliard
- Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-… Christian de Larrinaga
- Re: [TLS] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-… Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-… Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-… Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-… Peter Gutmann
- [TLS] Results of Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-oldve… Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-… tom petch
- Re: [TLS] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-… Gary Gapinski
- Re: [TLS] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-… tom petch
- Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-… tom petch