IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] Confirming consensus: TLS1.3->TLS*

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Fri, 02 December 2016 13:47 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCB09129FA4 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 05:47:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.597
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HRLeqJeCDexc for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 05:47:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay07.akamai.com (prod-mail-xrelay07.akamai.com [23.79.238.175]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CF9F129C66 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 05:47:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay07.akamai.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by postfix.imss70 (Postfix) with ESMTP id C468F43346B; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 13:47:20 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from prod-mail-relay10.akamai.com (prod-mail-relay10.akamai.com [172.27.118.251]) by prod-mail-xrelay07.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB280433462; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 13:47:20 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; s=a1; t=1480686440; bh=QRZXEdeWHnTct7GeR8lFAuvzvZ9EK/mKiLylvRBDDVY=; l=432; h=From:To:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=hOOZEFryz8ZpSGI0J4rhel3PGZdgU8dZOP/dXUTvucWnRLhXCLFjga/EHTmFyIt0q Zu/3EOO+ueTYd/17zWX8fDlXODPHLg2r9rHo+oDfrYeAI2Eot8Z7lTeKwUrIeIdauk W+5WwH+W8m98NYde+vQhzfGAulilWIZoHGFa+1NQ=
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com (usma1ex-casadmn.msg.corp.akamai.com [172.27.123.33]) by prod-mail-relay10.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FD141FC8D; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 13:47:20 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb2.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.102) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1178.4; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 08:47:19 -0500
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1178.000; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 08:47:20 -0500
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Hubert Kario <hkario@redhat.com>, "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [TLS] Confirming consensus: TLS1.3->TLS*
Thread-Index: AQHSQUF9yvv3al+6E0mEp3NhmRhrEqDwX4eAgAJbVYCAAC0nAIAABEIAgAFpLoCAAA++gIAAhccA///XiQA=
Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2016 13:47:20 +0000
Message-ID: <75c46572e29141f69397d4511761ddc3@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
References: <CF83FAD0-B337-4F9E-A80B-2BAA6826BF41@sn3rd.com> <CAHOTMVJzvf8v0S3vhFASekd6ksut0uNBhJDmuYzSQcJfy6JYpg@mail.gmail.com> <1480648354917.41781@cs.auckland.ac.nz> <1714292.gybZQF1xmo@pintsize.usersys.redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <1714292.gybZQF1xmo@pintsize.usersys.redhat.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.32.174]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/y6L7hF07JuOeg7guTKuN6boVZXE>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Confirming consensus: TLS1.3->TLS*
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2016 13:47:46 -0000

> People already know that SSL3 is worse than "SSL" 1.0 though 1.2 , it's logical
> that SSL 1.3 continues that trend. creating "SSL" 4 will bring more confusion.

Please explain that assertion.

--  
Senior Architect, Akamai Technologies
Member, OpenSSL Dev Team
IM: richsalz@jabber.at Twitter: RichSalz

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email