Re: [TLS] Ensuring consistent strength across certificate, ECDHE, cipher, and MAC

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Wed, 23 March 2016 02:20 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B898012DA36 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 19:20:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.722
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.722 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OLj0rOyWqs4K for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 19:20:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay05.akamai.com (prod-mail-xrelay05.akamai.com [23.79.238.179]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBD2812D608 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 19:20:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay05.akamai.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by postfix.imss70 (Postfix) with ESMTP id 119E33F4052; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 02:20:02 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from prod-mail-relay11.akamai.com (prod-mail-relay11.akamai.com [172.27.118.250]) by prod-mail-xrelay05.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8BA24F0D9; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 02:20:01 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; s=a1; t=1458699601; bh=L+vg/Q6aBBEZiZ3iEnDUJ2VZhdIHrrRwuBcStK03Mq4=; l=360; h=From:To:CC:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=rw3DcCxirEd2Grn2RKBCiafTU0iY95DQh580x9xyGcJ73aG9mXxFQ+JOK7rzlcPXq EE57z7k8wp5UtpSlaNiEQqDgOh+EYY0yvFPOeSeNnisw1gPQiG7wpJRqPZppLaCosW JYVO+DJMDp6O//mXEc//OlygbOXzEz/jKBVkDLnI=
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com (usma1ex-casadmn.msg.corp.akamai.com [172.27.123.33]) by prod-mail-relay11.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94C031FC90; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 02:20:01 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb2.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.102) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1130.7; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 22:20:01 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1130.005; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 22:20:01 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Timothy Jackson <tjackson@mobileiron.com>
Thread-Topic: [TLS] Ensuring consistent strength across certificate, ECDHE, cipher, and MAC
Thread-Index: AQHRhJxIvdQqc8JxV0CUtKcN/21N7p9mdLWA///WljA=
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 02:20:00 +0000
Message-ID: <f6b4b6618cb04f6096d28d58b6cc5fb8@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
References: <97CC494E-FB13-4A6B-8824-80CF2C7A76BF@mobileiron.com> <CABkgnnVB2-0qiRPZJXJf7uwRjPW-SdTrRv9od3WxMbyeQO6C5w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnVB2-0qiRPZJXJf7uwRjPW-SdTrRv9od3WxMbyeQO6C5w@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.36.152]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/y6i-3492gahmRNLGMPlB7flIxPk>
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Ensuring consistent strength across certificate, ECDHE, cipher, and MAC
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 02:20:06 -0000

> How would this group feel about a proposal to address this by
> specifying in the 1.3 specification that implementations must ensure
> that the strength of the certificate must be >= strength of ECDHE/DHE >=
> strength of the cipher?

Strongly opposed, for the reasons Martin said.  Insisting that everything line up is kinda like crypto OCD.