[TLS] Re: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-super-jumbo-record-limit-02 (Ends 2025-11-25)

[Sean Turner <[e-mail]>]

A final reminder that this WGLC ends tomorrow.

spt

> On Nov 20, 2025, at 11:00, Sean Turner <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Another reminder that this is still on-going.
> 
> spt
> 
>> On Nov 13, 2025, at 19:25, Sean Turner <[e-mail]> wrote:
>> 
>> Just a reminder that this is still on-going.
>> 
>> spt
>> 
>>> On Nov 4, 2025, at 23:55, Sean Turner via Datatracker <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Subject: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-super-jumbo-record-limit-02 (Ends
>>> 2025-11-25)
>>> 
>>> This message starts a 3-week WG Last Call for this document.
>>> 
>>> Abstract:
>>> TLS 1.3 records limit the inner plaintext (TLSInnerPlaintext) size to
>>> 2^14 + 1 bytes, which includes one byte for the content type.
>>> Records also have a 3-byte overhead due to the fixed opaque_type and
>>> legacy_record_version fields.  This document defines a TLS extension
>>> that allows endpoints to negotiate a larger maximum inner plaintext
>>> size, up to 2^30 - 256 bytes, while reducing overhead.
>>> 
>>> File can be retrieved from:
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-super-jumbo-record-limit/
>>> 
>>> Please review and indicate your support or objection to proceed with the
>>> publication of this document by replying to this email keeping [e-mail]
>>> in copy. Objections should be motivated and suggestions to resolve them are
>>> highly appreciated.
>>> 
>>> Authors, and WG participants in general, are reminded again of the
>>> Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) disclosure obligations described in BCP 79
>>> [1]. Appropriate IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the
>>> provisions of BCP 78 [1] and BCP 79 [2] must be filed, if you are aware of
>>> any. Sanctions available for application to violators of IETF IPR Policy can
>>> be found at [3].
>>> 
>>> Thank you.
>>> 
>>> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp78/
>>> [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp79/
>>> [3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6701/
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>