IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] renegotiation draft needs clarification !!

Nasko Oskov <noskov@microsoft.com> Thu, 12 November 2009 07:54 UTC

Return-Path: <noskov@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: tls@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 149883A6919 for <tls@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 23:54:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CKqc6PZFhF4T for <tls@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 23:54:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.microsoft.com (smtp.microsoft.com [131.107.115.215]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74C3F3A68FA for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 23:54:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from TK5EX14MLTC103.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.79.174) by TK5-EXGWY-E802.partners.extranet.microsoft.com (10.251.56.168) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.176.0; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 23:54:55 -0800
Received: from TK5EX14MLTW651.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com (157.54.71.39) by TK5EX14MLTC103.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.79.174) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.0.639.20; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 23:54:55 -0800
Received: from TK5EX14MBXW653.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com ([169.254.3.181]) by TK5EX14MLTW651.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com ([157.54.71.39]) with mapi; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 23:54:55 -0800
From: Nasko Oskov <noskov@microsoft.com>
To: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [TLS] renegotiation draft needs clarification !!
Thread-Index: AQHKYzdxJQvjwrCuIEim8qy91YCQnZEyNCAAgAAK4wCAABYCAP//vnhQ
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 07:52:38 +0000
Deferred-Delivery: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 07:53:00 +0000
Message-ID: <B197003731D4874CA41DE7B446BBA3E829CB7DB0@TK5EX14MBXW653.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
References: <4AFB64FA.1060505@bolyard.me> <e8c553a60911111748m44921264s44cfc8fcc34c21fd@mail.gmail.com> <4AFB728C.9050102@bolyard.me> <4AFB8502.60102@pobox.com>
In-Reply-To: <4AFB8502.60102@pobox.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 00:22:28 -0800
Subject: Re: [TLS] renegotiation draft needs clarification !!
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 08:02:09 -0000

>>>> This leads to two different encodings, which are:
>>>>
>>>>  FF 01 00 00
>>>>
>>>>  FF 01 00 01 00
>
>I will selfishly vote for the second choice since that is
>how I implemented it, though it would be easy to change.

I interpreted it the same way, as an empty vector.
Thanks,	
Nasko

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email