IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] WGLC for draft-ietf-tls-hybrid-design

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Sat, 30 April 2022 19:06 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0B71C15EB28 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 30 Apr 2022 12:06:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tMhEgSW33Fgt for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 30 Apr 2022 12:06:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (mail3.g24.pair.com [66.39.134.11]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36801C15E6E0 for <TLS@ietf.org>; Sat, 30 Apr 2022 12:06:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08B2213AA5E for <TLS@ietf.org>; Sat, 30 Apr 2022 15:06:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.2] (pfs.iad.rg.net [198.180.150.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F3C2B13ABAC for <TLS@ietf.org>; Sat, 30 Apr 2022 15:06:22 -0400 (EDT)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.21\))
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2022 15:06:22 -0400
References: <27E9945C-6A0A-46DD-89F0-22BE59188216@heapingbits.net> <e43fc649-3fc6-333b-c44d-55de0627c710@cs.tcd.ie>
To: IETF TLS <TLS@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <e43fc649-3fc6-333b-c44d-55de0627c710@cs.tcd.ie>
Message-Id: <7361E486-246C-49F3-8FDB-9FDDA7FFC4D2@vigilsec.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.21)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/yQ4P8dZwzBzeF_ttaBpVy196Kxk>
Subject: Re: [TLS] WGLC for draft-ietf-tls-hybrid-design
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2022 19:06:25 -0000


> On Apr 29, 2022, at 8:24 PM, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> wrote:
> 
> On 27/04/2022 16:27, Christopher Wood wrote:
>> This email commences a two week WGLC for draft-ietf-tls-hybrid-design, located here:
>>    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-hybrid-design/
> 
> As I guess I've said before, I think progressing this draft
> now, even with this WGLC-then-park approach, is premature.

I agree.  I think I said as much when the call for adoption went out.  Let's hold off for the NIST winner to be announced.

Russ

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email