Re: [TLS] Confirming consensus: TLS1.3->TLS*

Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org> Fri, 18 November 2016 11:53 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E340C1294F3 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Nov 2016 03:53:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D1O9QxkqMSlA for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Nov 2016 03:53:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mournblade.imrryr.org (mournblade.imrryr.org [38.117.134.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD81F1294D4 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Nov 2016 03:53:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mournblade.imrryr.org (Postfix, from userid 1034) id 7D6A5284B6F; Fri, 18 Nov 2016 11:53:21 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 11:53:21 +0000
From: Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
To: tls@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20161118115321.GR26244@mournblade.imrryr.org>
References: <CF83FAD0-B337-4F9E-A80B-2BAA6826BF41@sn3rd.com> <CABkgnnX8jyA8iimweV3vDT0c4yph9i1121+9B9z2HXDAXcddtA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnX8jyA8iimweV3vDT0c4yph9i1121+9B9z2HXDAXcddtA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/yfT53ux_ssEMvV4OVxJivZCS8yA>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Confirming consensus: TLS1.3->TLS*
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tls@ietf.org
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 11:53:24 -0000

On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 06:42:44PM +0900, Martin Thomson wrote:

> There is no point in re-litigating this decision.  The consensus call
> was pretty clear in the room.

My impression was that the list is where rough consensus is
established, and consensus in "the room" does not preempt discussion
on the list.  Rather "the room" merely provides an early indication
of the likely consensus position.

-- 
	Viktor.