Re: [TLS] SNI from CDN to Origin (was I-D Action: draft-ietf-tls-sni-encryption-08.txt)

Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> Wed, 09 October 2019 15:22 UTC

Return-Path: <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41AD11200B7 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 08:22:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2wf97mX0K82B for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 08:22:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd35.google.com (mail-io1-xd35.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F204120089 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 08:22:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd35.google.com with SMTP id q1so5909810ion.1 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 09 Oct 2019 08:22:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=53HWDhEKs1mVE9gv2GCTJctRoCVbQsooJgM0fxn5tlc=; b=QhjnCRleNskPN0p/dGtkj0cUvSaP9QxMHbeA6USdpVe3iCDYBZcFSiNq59ZiBgIfv4 POYc5cc5pEXi0nDXLInc66cX5bXOOTbsEz+Pw6p9U1NSa9bXT5bkG2nqRmRCjiWG+L6a HGviAsV5gCzZcN4kUop2LUVzxCc9XqH5ywFgGSGKF+F2Qx4fiEto02dGWQgz7ZGGBYkB OScf2z7b0kbatXyFzlEobkrra6g0qwqxCgbbYtRUbq/mQvv3b/b1yHMBXsM2meNPlqe3 nI5qpweQg4Rf32gfkQ+nu7j7rXZKXEDPE1vP6xxc6fLqisIQ0Yidf7cyjOX5MF9vSdxX I7Sw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=53HWDhEKs1mVE9gv2GCTJctRoCVbQsooJgM0fxn5tlc=; b=Gnmj5EY+hWONlMXYLdWz9P7dEJoOwJbnHa3pw3ZyiahZsl6HgzszW7nI8AgUHDU2Vf S5lIgQiOBaZ+LICZKFonnbSKP0wMh7u1n/LkM7KHF9fW3fv5ER0Dr+vz72iO6949/Z0B Re9ZMQGbDaQvw7onUJtx6gInruqUgJ2vJyzF3V8svEYpGLoKBpTTSWGLMyRsS711Cypn hcuRvS4AhxvW0FgWffTcuY8xnOTj81IiABU9OquPtTNKoVIn8R9XN3A5xpeMa6GIy/e3 Mm1uG9nJxUI+xroSWaV32t4F9Bhi0CZUQqRsymp6upcclC0910MDFdTdxUtj6MvJwGPu 7yEA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVicS3cLvV/b4/MxoHOX+o9UsQ0WvEHnO8+lLd1nf5CX8JtuIzV x1I9CuePKqNiI1nV2sF6i1vFHp8nXEEwOU4fqsw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxpkFdHzyfsNgKjZ+pHnY0R8ztUATzo247usTLCOuADW02UHf7ZSR1KZ4Fk1p9LWUuV52lbN06fib7RQ1cBBCc=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:928:: with SMTP id 8mr3524980jak.124.1570634552208; Wed, 09 Oct 2019 08:22:32 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <157048178892.4743.5417505225884589066@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAChr6Sy9=GbUO19X0vc0Dz7c565iPAj=uWVujLV5P3_QL5_srw@mail.gmail.com> <28C7A74D-5F9D-4E1A-A2D2-155417DA51C0@akamai.com> <CAChr6Szay7j=czCaYhKGp9bHHmZiArU440hSnvNqNaL+hX2wKA@mail.gmail.com> <F932C81B-95E9-4044-B975-9AFCD09CF7FA@akamai.com> <CAChr6Sy=+qt=KYKfXEkWhBBev88-XEcB4tOZLz9cBf76wsUo2g@mail.gmail.com> <80F168B0-7F30-4FDA-BD0F-4C787802F0D5@akamai.com> <CAChr6SyV+qMFs56THZzBxNv5vkQTeBJdG9GtutvVMcyP2CxN7w@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBNtv-4=dtrArZwnJHSohrbsrtG53_ynSZdcMp=YeWc9iA@mail.gmail.com> <CAChr6SzCONU2yA87QGNhsx7=5Zn82v1_euBJ-kbRci4vJ32oUw@mail.gmail.com> <83192EC8-6A24-4638-80AC-6D2AF9C68BBB@akamai.com> <CAChr6SwdP7iA=ZYg+xa3Ye-b97sekw6=qwJZu2w0n1ZZC9wG+Q@mail.gmail.com> <E679DBE6-CEC8-486B-A2EA-EEED38D4E4C8@alipay.com> <CAChr6SzRZJ4g=TDwM2jjhp8S_Oyk+kQ0VNEsd3FYV2xVBn-sNw@mail.gmail.com> <8D9F60B9-E507-4465-B761-BAD37B6E1156@alipay.com> <CAChr6SzLn57ak5wgWUyW=wpcG09n1PtsOXVWZ0TBmj+r7TOF2A@mail.gmail.com> <15062b36-8691-24e8-9764-2976d4fac0fe@huitema.net>
In-Reply-To: <15062b36-8691-24e8-9764-2976d4fac0fe@huitema.net>
From: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2019 22:22:19 +0700
Message-ID: <CAChr6SzxmTYGQyPatPS2n365S0MgBX4Zj2y=qVDNGUivyec1GA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>
Cc: Paul Yang <kaishen.yy@alipay.com>, "TLS@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000008e726a05947bda5a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/ygrbmcdKjwjnsBp8Q6jBiPttutM>
Subject: Re: [TLS] SNI from CDN to Origin (was I-D Action: draft-ietf-tls-sni-encryption-08.txt)
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2019 15:22:35 -0000

On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 10:18 PM Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>;
wrote:

> I struggle a bit to understand how this thread is related to the SNI
> Encryption Requirements document. Rob, you raise the question of using and
> possibly hiding the SNI when using TLS to protect communication between
> servers. That's a fine debate, but I don't see how this specific usage of
> TLS and SNI affects the draft or change the requirements on SNI encryption
> mechanics. We also have an interesting process issue, because this draft
> already went through WG last call, IETF last call, and IESG review. At this
> stage, it would take a huge issue to stop the presses and rework the
> document.
>

Hello,

I didn't realize the document was at that phase. Also, my suggestion can be
added at any time.

So, I don't think this discussion should hold up any progression in the
IETF process.

Sorry for any confusion.

I support moving this document forward.

thanks,
Rob