[TLS] Call for WG adoption of draft-shore-tls-dnssec-chain-extension

Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com> Mon, 25 April 2016 15:12 UTC

Return-Path: <sean@sn3rd.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8B2E12D526 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 08:12:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=sn3rd.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YuAc3Yvs9VSR for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 08:12:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf0-x22c.google.com (mail-pf0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DB8D12D156 for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 08:12:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id 206so18567657pfu.0 for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 08:12:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sn3rd.com; s=google; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:subject:message-id:date:to :mime-version; bh=tmB+c6w4ffrka4CQnFX1r/4WjfWqmhaoNFN2SlXzriY=; b=KSSuVS+aXYcQwQ1tRSWtBuLvQjY65GHal4sbLFPkcIve6a+RR2nl4d6tTGvWm3ximc QRON/DbPr8/xo4cKHjP+rJGqrpaYCS1HNk1rn6kqqiEss1qizp+fJJ9Ta03TJlfehr9y Xs0WC6H+ovgLMteHi8T68ylKAwyiNmfNI22uY=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:subject :message-id:date:to:mime-version; bh=tmB+c6w4ffrka4CQnFX1r/4WjfWqmhaoNFN2SlXzriY=; b=GTTAK4j/6saifcMQiIvc0YEW4IYx9PcDu4n1flIhd5wurUFF3fPeWsKo2P72Yzwpvm a4+w35oz54zNF7RyzuCLSjmTrzImmvlqUYJbi78eV+Vm+T8aVJttJ2WI01SsoMb+Ai9b C6wgJBzWWy9SlMlHIr406hnX0krcaSnAqBDFrbNuNat89dofMt9fyN2hpmaU0LXHb07y 9KLFSMe0Ot7QOjLI+VoN3PjAWh3gtp7yqpluge1jdD4AswgzmKPBUGAb4PdrXKyzVeGd gfXIfc63ZyOR9WgMM9paptkCEURGlWr3i973GG+QnxyKDJvR/AcnF6hhgg1t3gYvHsLb iOPg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FUlHTn5lsrVBJmjTsKCJP4i6POHOLyLPH1zLQaiMajQszSomi/Q+Qi7ZmK2kdLYqA==
X-Received: by 10.98.92.135 with SMTP id q129mr48699395pfb.71.1461597135576; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 08:12:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.20.10.4] ([166.177.250.132]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m186sm29582097pfm.29.2016.04.25.08.12.14 for <tls@ietf.org> (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 25 Apr 2016 08:12:14 -0700 (PDT)
From: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A475030C-FEFD-4069-B540-495AC4C32352@sn3rd.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 08:12:17 -0700
To: tls <tls@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/ymEtvciDKGgI2JrGP6wlV7XWy7I>
Subject: [TLS] Call for WG adoption of draft-shore-tls-dnssec-chain-extension
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 15:12:19 -0000

All,

draft-shore-tls-dnssec-chain-extension was originally discussed at IETF 93 [0], and the authors have been biding their time while the WG thrashed out TLS1.3s' issues.  At IETF 95, they presented again [1], but this time the chairs took a sense of the room about whether the WG was in favor of adopting the draft.  According to the minutes, there were “crickets” against and “lots of noise” for adoption.  But, we need to take it to the list so please indicate whether you:

- Support adoption and are willing to review/comment on the draft by 201600429.  Note that the extensions is pretty straight forward, but the chairs still need people to comment on the draft as we’re processing it down the path.

- Object to the adoption of this draft as a WG item, please respond to the list indicating why by 201600510.

Cheers,

J&S

[0] https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/93/slides/slides-93-tls-1.pdf
[1] https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/95/slides/slides-95-tls-3.pdf