Re: [TLS] (draft) WG adoption call: draft-bmoeller-tls-falsestart

Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> Wed, 01 April 2015 09:49 UTC

Return-Path: <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB0971A01A5 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 02:49:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UfVVBXrvIavB for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 02:49:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26DCD1A014C for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 02:49:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.131.146] ([80.92.114.249]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Lk7fW-1Z9Xsp01V4-00c7yi; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 11:49:13 +0200
Message-ID: <551BBF17.3090600@gmx.net>
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 11:49:11 +0200
From: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com>, "<tls@ietf.org>" <tls@ietf.org>
References: <813475A8-DC71-42BA-A27E-DF11B0155FD1@ieca.com>
In-Reply-To: <813475A8-DC71-42BA-A27E-DF11B0155FD1@ieca.com>
OpenPGP: id=4D776BC9
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pbDen1KCSVcnk9s2F3eBxDaeXSThEaVn0"
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:wG19oXWDwuQGRDpFkCnSZ/R4ELyuJ+3Iq95fVyQQbExjO9UX8rG m0gR7/x+YzhRrudOxvFTv7YhjyLIwL3QIAq9TcgROn2TOJqlVBSeJILYaxiuKrRpJZjCYPL iQTyQD02gTND+DHim0+jbaMz37A9O/z1Y48LcbCHy2WTzEApshy6eAFLXwwOb+uW1tklKp+ tiNfElRPDqgibDjjVK7OA==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/ynXAViC4KfMOWAbemtzrDJ2y6f8>
Subject: Re: [TLS] (draft) WG adoption call: draft-bmoeller-tls-falsestart
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 09:49:21 -0000

I support the publication of this document to capture existing
deployments. Happy to review the doc.

On 03/31/2015 06:20 PM, Sean Turner wrote:
> All,
> 
> There’s been some interested expressed in having
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bmoeller-tls-falsestart/
> adopted as a TLS WG item.  If you would like for this draft to become
> a WG document, and you are willing to review drafts as it moves
> through the process please indicate as much on this thread.  If you
> are opposed to this being a WG document, please say so (and say why).
> Thanks in advance.
> 
> J&S _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list 
> TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>