[TLS] Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7250 (5013)
Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com> Wed, 05 November 2025 23:24 UTC
Return-Path: <sean@sn3rd.com>
X-Original-To: tls@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: tls@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2BFC83F98C0 for <tls@mail2.ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Nov 2025 15:24:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=sn3rd.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RiufPksBFA7H for <tls@mail2.ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Nov 2025 15:24:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt1-x82f.google.com (mail-qt1-x82f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82f]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D0A283F98B1 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Nov 2025 15:24:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt1-x82f.google.com with SMTP id d75a77b69052e-4ecee8ce926so2840821cf.1 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 05 Nov 2025 15:24:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sn3rd.com; s=google; t=1762385048; x=1762989848; darn=ietf.org; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=mYdJMo4dmzOifsskiJJLmjUP92rrEkkxcHoNly0VK5E=; b=L/ToHel3kZcIuAgkn9LgZPX8V/8JXBRnM5eEVjIgjZ83TsFdxFdJRX7JbjTCjdyBTY fY2E26kMAuAsqmyWKm16VzT/5asD8QBprgo2uJHFLNbE3+hiJbxs80DGDlt6Knm3lnCy F8MMo5avDvVOWIibw3l9HBCXBvZlk3EVdqzqI=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1762385048; x=1762989848; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=mYdJMo4dmzOifsskiJJLmjUP92rrEkkxcHoNly0VK5E=; b=wVYHiuZ9lxNgW/JQNGv9prkjlLewgRyM7ePTdVhWAEpubhQoaRnAgLbe5eq75dzBS0 Mo9HyvAMQoaEpHwBUwSAguai1kcjOQJL4bYzE4isVVkeC99ctSTnuGuyixlA6sCkqgKs pa1R6AskkY+oSIwPSKx1f6IkPmBsfZtY2eM3Cr4QctOLowK6AUyUL3SYeh4Fwu3N2mAd Qd1OS9pl179QwGbnPh7bP2aOjeQve8SW6ZBjrpIMu55wgiSjBT3Q0mOPNew5PGgQX9pK oeCY+fVGo4BWDo8E8bFjm68VxU5kj9attL5U12VMYkINgFDjn9BDcaQHU+e/8xFBDajo Fh4Q==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXxuWp+IwESHNIZ8aw0IYzg9I+QgAOlECtD+WNdCCyWfwkUMdaPlmrdnCtyqj72QULvgIc=@ietf.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yzb+dDuZfpCWxGiRdyqm8nRAPU2p/KRjlYDN9P5r9G7KGM35Tgt E8bZJBbfq+GnRg2CWQYcdzx/kF7fapbWWPqaH/h+JhHYHjHj60w3OqwV+fRqA8u2sOU=
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncu2nDOFgYgr6XNy8JkAEhcTAj6f7IgvzNopzagmSK1tBv8vrIfsqlkToz/tt3i IcRKJjKKfkIlCKeI98EXfrnL5rLj4wk65ijzRLZMQmSPofXFpchBt2XBWg9g6YGqDvBDh00BCU7 FpCYimGi3Q+nVTfgcLBXWnIcv1NM1/po++wV9Vavd/E37pxAQXdhOTZhANd1qnCx5at0VgTksUr YCV+DjBBXEe0JP99tJwxj7wknZQPcS0njzpC1+Xajrhngpt66v4t3GpXJa/VfhvshrxIX5m/mYY D1xyA/Qz/0R4mMCsfCNW3kh5TcH7+I7qGU7xyl+8jOqkR5SLbXJXJW1HEWsF59smhMEdILF0k0A qPQFAOjqDPEO/XqX6ushG/Tm8AdnloIX7os/jwSXQv2MTDIQYLJKAmlfmxKerppULEl9vZrjh/T tIWqBv1TFJRSDshFOePMH6sRUk1ez4+MpX98z2O/rC2V5kfh63ecA0oJ4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IH/f9tuGG8KvN+OQ0tVlCgysbEpxt0cu4cyFUb5SK/P6skqFFUkoZowl7+XyXMDMd7vPce4gw==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:11c7:b0:4eb:d83e:2e65 with SMTP id d75a77b69052e-4ed72337fdemr72156411cf.25.1762385048594; Wed, 05 Nov 2025 15:24:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([2001:67c:370:1998:c557:a4e8:f56f:72a9]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d75a77b69052e-4ed81350e98sm5705121cf.16.2025.11.05.15.24.07 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 05 Nov 2025 15:24:07 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3826.700.81\))
From: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>
In-Reply-To: <201705102015.v4AKFtXw029772@new.toad.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2025 18:23:46 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B6E2ACC5-A68E-40AD-BEFB-4ED7DABEEFB7@sn3rd.com>
References: <20170510064522.66A00B81089@rfc-editor.org> <201705102015.v4AKFtXw029772@new.toad.com>
To: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3826.700.81)
Message-ID-Hash: HUB2HJ4RE2JWI42AGKL3SGHIVMB2C45W
X-Message-ID-Hash: HUB2HJ4RE2JWI42AGKL3SGHIVMB2C45W
X-MailFrom: sean@sn3rd.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tls.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, pwouters@redhat.com, Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net>, weiler@tislabs.com, Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>, Kathleen Moriarty <Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>, sean+ietf@sn3rd.com, x@example.net, TLS List <tls@ietf.org>, John Gilmore <gnu@toad.com>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [TLS] Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7250 (5013)
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/z9AHaD7klVyF1laHKGCiioXIRtI>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tls-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tls-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tls-leave@ietf.org>
Paul, Based on John’s email can we mark this one as HFDU? spt > On May 10, 2017, at 16:15, John Gilmore <gnu@toad.com> wrote: > > I agree that the erratum is an editorial, not technical, change. > > It is a slight improvement on the current wording, but is in no way > required for interoperability, since the same information is available > at the source already cited in the paragraph (the TLS ExtensionType > Values subregistry at IANA). > > I recommend that we keep it in the editorial queue for folding > in if/when the RFC is ever revised for other reasons. > > John
- [TLS] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7250 (5013) RFC Errata System
- Re: [TLS] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7250 (50… Sean Turner
- Re: [TLS] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7250 (50… Paul Wouters
- Re: [TLS] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7250 (50… John Gilmore
- [TLS] Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7250 (50… Sean Turner