[TLS] [IANA #1441863] expert review for draft-ietf-tls-ecdhe-mlkem (tls-parameters)
David Dong via RT <drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org> Wed, 27 May 2026 01:14 UTC
Return-Path: <iana-shared@iana.org>
X-Original-To: tls@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: tls@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92365F5A3E09; Tue, 26 May 2026 18:14:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1779844453; bh=0JDV/eUn37Sk0Io2JcbhArW6jm4QoHJGOR+J4aqwOIE=; h=Subject:From:Reply-To:In-Reply-To:References:CC:Date; b=WFDOT3I3virp+ot9nrCwmNPMDjmgAnQKRhT5pxCMwMAk6UGdcCxl3StrUic1gCj8J L3SOto99JPBun5FK0e5MPzkK3sQheKm3iw85JAA1EIoA5DexrfOArqYNhQsK56Knd9 XX9jyBhc70XEFCLlYWig4PjNdWT1B9eC9++Je1n4=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.375
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.375 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=iana.org
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XIx1JeH_6qu8; Tue, 26 May 2026 18:14:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.lax.icann.org (smtp.lax.icann.org [192.0.33.81]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF19BF5A3E04; Tue, 26 May 2026 18:14:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from request7.lax.icann.org (request1.lax.icann.org [10.32.11.221]) by smtp.lax.icann.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4207FE2049; Wed, 27 May 2026 01:14:12 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp.lax.icann.org 4207FE2049
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iana.org; s=202509s; t=1779844452; bh=sbIsXOkWEScRrTGJDBRYy/R4wiS7EyixSFgkWUvfkXc=; h=Subject:From:Reply-To:In-Reply-To:References:CC:Date:From; b=Fz4CtppShwO9oecZd1SMiT9WEGU0c8YnuMmlUsWJ8elT6zlTJNy8WUQgzJdaSo2Ej QamimA1Gh4ENtZkzmEXBYM+K4hRJwBV11pwEjWKsGygbgbD/EDDcDDVx2Pd0UfJT0+ LOw0L0IS4Cq90RbJ1VDuSZnuYiFzsswx0KhxsKe0=
Received: by request7.lax.icann.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 1E036C0F0EC5; Wed, 27 May 2026 01:14:12 +0000 (UTC)
RT-Owner: david.dong
From: David Dong via RT <drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org>
In-Reply-To: <rt-5.0.3-543732-1769643939-1864.1441863-9-0@icann.org>
References: <RT-Ticket-1441863@icann.org> <rt-5.0.3-836181-1768931779-1343.1441863-9-0@icann.org> <rt-5.0.3-1324061-1769129055-910.1441863-9-0@icann.org> <MN2PR17MB40315C01EADA4B156ED538F1CD94A@MN2PR17MB4031.namprd17.prod.outlook.com> <rt-5.0.3-1324057-1769130205-1134.1441863-9-0@icann.org> <rt-5.0.3-543731-1769641799-664.1441863-9-0@icann.org> <CAOjisRwh5Y5UmuMVYSdi=wEnaOS2WMtZKOoXzaAGTE2k-77Qtg@mail.gmail.com> <rt-5.0.3-543732-1769643939-1864.1441863-9-0@icann.org>
Message-ID: <rt-5.0.3-480395-1779844452-1527.1441863-9-0@icann.org>
X-RT-Loop-Prevention: IANA
X-RT-Ticket: IANA #1441863
X-Managed-BY: RT 5.0.3 (http://www.bestpractical.com/rt/)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8
Precedence: bulk
Date: Wed, 27 May 2026 01:14:12 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID-Hash: CJBTVKWBDHEYCKOJ4ZV4PME5T4VAOWQY
X-Message-ID-Hash: CJBTVKWBDHEYCKOJ4ZV4PME5T4VAOWQY
X-MailFrom: iana-shared@iana.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tls.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: tls-reg-review@ietf.org, tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Reply-To: drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org
Subject: [TLS] [IANA #1441863] expert review for draft-ietf-tls-ecdhe-mlkem (tls-parameters)
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/zAjdauCEizYFdlcCW9uzL7BZn6E>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tls-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tls-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tls-leave@ietf.org>
Hi Rich, Yoav, Nick (cc: tls WG), draft-ietf-tls-ecdhe-mlkem is back in IETF Last Call; the only registration change in -05 from -04 (which Rich and Nick had reviewed) is the "Recommended" field for X25519MLKEM768, which is now set to "Y"; this requires DE approval. As the designated experts for the TLS Supported Groups registries, could you let us know if this is OK? The due date is June 16th; we will wait for 2/3 approvals before marking this expert review as OK. Thank you. Best regards, David Dong IANA Services Sr. Specialist On Wed Jan 28 23:45:39 2026, nicholas.sullivan@gmail.com wrote: > Hi David, > > This draft proposes two changes: it adds 3 new codepoints, and it > obsoletes > 2 codepoints. There was a previous IANA request from an earlier > version of > the draft (draft-kwiatkowski-tls-ecdhe-mlkem-03) that was actioned > before > (IANA #1409969), so the codepoints have all been created but the > obsoleted > codepoints have not been marked as discouraged yet. > > I approve the action that applies the final changes proposed by this > draft > to the IANA table: > - Update the Recommended and Comment fields of 25497 and 25498 > - Update the Reference field of 4587, 4588, 4589 to point to the final > RFC > > No additional changes are needed since the current draft is > interoperable > with the previous draft and the Recommended column stays as N. > > > Side note: > The points are listed out of numerical order in the draft because the > order > in which they present the algorithms differs from the order during the > last > IANA action, which is fine. > > Best, > Nick > > > On Wed, Jan 28, 2026 at 6:10 PM David Dong via RT < > drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org> wrote: > > > Hi Yoav, Nick (cc: tls WG), > > > > Following up on this; could one of you also approve the TLS Supported > > Groups registrations in draft-ietf-tls-ecdhe-mlkem-03 for us? Rich > > has > > already approved this. > > > > Please see: > > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-ecdhe-mlkem/ > > > > Best regards, > > > > David Dong > > IANA Services Sr. Specialist > > > > On Fri Jan 23 01:03:25 2026, rsalz@akamai.com wrote: > > > Looks good; approved. > > > > > > From: David Dong via RT <drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org> > > > Date: Thursday, January 22, 2026 at 7:44 PM > > > To: > > > Cc: tls@ietf.org <tls@ietf.org>, tls-reg-review@ietf.org <tls-reg- > > > review@ietf.org> > > > Subject: [Tls-reg-review] [IANA #1441863] expert review for draft- > > > ietf-tls-ecdhe-mlkem (tls-parameters) > > > > > > !------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > | > > > This Message Is From an External Sender > > > This message came from outside your organization. > > > |------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > ! > > > > > > Dear Yoav Nir, Rich Salz, Nick Sullivan (cc: tls WG), > > > > > > As the designated experts for the TLS Supported Groups registry, > > > can > > > you review the proposed registration in draft-ietf-tls-ecdhe-mlkem- > > > 03 > > > for us? Please see > > > > > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft- > > > ietf-tls-ecdhe- > > > > > mlkem/__;!!GjvTz_vk!X_9HDXBSYSiYIdWDQTlqsItApwn0zvkVyIPohVcRwitIhCn6IlYyebqoTM5KoA6RCxfj1P63EjzJDCg_KMvb- > > > ao$ > > > > > > The due date is February 12th. > > > > > > If this is OK, when the IESG approves the document for publication, > > > we'll make the registration at: > > > > > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.iana.org/assignments/tls- > > > > > parameters/__;!!GjvTz_vk!X_9HDXBSYSiYIdWDQTlqsItApwn0zvkVyIPohVcRwitIhCn6IlYyebqoTM5KoA6RCxfj1P63EjzJDCg_od58hyw$ > > > > > > Unless you ask us to wait for the other reviewer[s], we’ll act on > > > the > > > first response we receive. > > > > > > With thanks, > > > > > > David Dong > > > IANA Services Sr. Specialist > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > tls-reg-review mailing list -- tls-reg-review@ietf.org > > > To unsubscribe send an email to tls-reg-review-leave@ietf.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > > tls-reg-review mailing list -- tls-reg-review@ietf.org > > To unsubscribe send an email to tls-reg-review-leave@ietf.org > >
- [TLS] [IANA #1441863] expert review for draft-iet… David Dong via RT
- [TLS] Re: [Tls-reg-review] [IANA #1441863] expert… Salz, Rich
- [TLS] [IANA #1441863] expert review for draft-iet… David Dong via RT
- [TLS] Re: [Tls-reg-review] [IANA #1441863] expert… Nick Sullivan
- [TLS] [IANA #1441863] expert review for draft-iet… David Dong via RT
- [TLS] Re: [Tls-reg-review] [IANA #1441863] expert… Salz, Rich
- [TLS] Re: [Tls-reg-review] Re: [IANA #1441863] ex… Nick Sullivan