Re: [TLS] TLS 1.2 Long-term Support Profile draft posted

Hubert Kario <hkario@redhat.com> Tue, 22 March 2016 11:29 UTC

Return-Path: <hkario@redhat.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 764F312D5B8 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 04:29:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.923
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.923 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J0QDtZrFjsGq for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 04:29:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FF4612D595 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 04:29:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0A3C6445D; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 11:29:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pintsize.usersys.redhat.com (dhcp-0-113.brq.redhat.com [10.34.0.113]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u2MBTVfe012063 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 22 Mar 2016 07:29:32 -0400
From: Hubert Kario <hkario@redhat.com>
To: tls@ietf.org
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 12:29:30 +0100
Message-ID: <3050121.iQnPKsMOqq@pintsize.usersys.redhat.com>
User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.4.5-200.fc22.x86_64; KDE/4.14.17; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <201603220026.47012.davemgarrett@gmail.com>
References: <9A043F3CF02CD34C8E74AC1594475C73F4C2374E@uxcn10-tdc05.UoA.auckland.ac.nz> <CAHOTMV+1jy24VSdQN7OGtj0PPGRSt2bDdSvkBCfzXL2rxVAQEg@mail.gmail.com> <201603220026.47012.davemgarrett@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1741414.VfJDIFC9Ce"; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.24
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.39]); Tue, 22 Mar 2016 11:29:32 +0000 (UTC)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/zSakoP-JcduN4kIKQEbsTdQct_M>
Subject: Re: [TLS] TLS 1.2 Long-term Support Profile draft posted
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 11:29:34 -0000

On Tuesday 22 March 2016 00:26:46 Dave Garrett wrote:
> On Monday, March 21, 2016 09:59:27 pm Tony Arcieri wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 12:42 PM, Dave Garrett 
<davemgarrett@gmail.com>; wrote:
> > > Frankly, I think this document should be renamed "Extended Support
> > > Profile", rather than "Long-term Support Profile" (and ESP instead
> > > of LTS).> 
> > Legacy Support Profile? Then you don't have to change the acronym
> 
> I don't exactly see a 'T' for "LTS" in "Legacy Support Profile"...  ;)

given that we're trying to predict future, Extra Sensory Perception is a 
good acronym to use ;)
-- 
Regards,
Hubert Kario
Senior Quality Engineer, QE BaseOS Security team
Web: www.cz.redhat.com
Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkyňova 99/71, 612 45, Brno, Czech Republic