[TLS] Mike Bishop's No Objection on draft-ietf-tls-esni-24: (with COMMENT)

[Mike Bishop via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Mike Bishop has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-tls-esni-24: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-esni/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I've previously reviewed this document and have very few additional comments;
these comments can be incorporated or ignored at the authors' and responsible
AD's discretion.

6.1.8: "has been forced to change" imputes external events that aren't relevant
to the protocol. The server's configuration may have changed since the client
received the retry configs; the client doesn't need to speculate on why.

10.9 notes that there's no collision between ECH acceptance (in 1.3) and
downgrade protection (in <1.3) because of the version scoping. It's worth
noting, however, that this forecloses using the same approach to guard against
downgrades to 1.3 from future TLS versions.