Re: [TLS] Issue 588: Code point assignment for ticket_early_data_info

Benjamin Kaduk <bkaduk@akamai.com> Wed, 31 August 2016 17:17 UTC

Return-Path: <bkaduk@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19B3812D12B for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 10:17:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.259
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.259 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=1.989, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oI8OsaKwIKSk for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 10:17:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay05.akamai.com (prod-mail-xrelay05.akamai.com [23.79.238.179]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7442E12D10B for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 10:17:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay05.akamai.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by postfix.imss70 (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5D3F423710; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 17:17:11 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from prod-mail-relay11.akamai.com (prod-mail-relay11.akamai.com [172.27.118.250]) by prod-mail-xrelay05.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8427042370A; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 17:17:11 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; s=a1; t=1472663831; bh=uWo6M2Cn0iFeOFf7xG7LK+VOhyOrN6QztFpaSiWMo4s=; l=3338; h=To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=Zh4GXsJAHRe/cVJGF/9M4DflZQerQqN3GeeHaRerIimCY6to6vmx16SFiogvqmrNG CfmAHMaIZ0pPPNWQ0v3wNYaL2/AL0TDWidi1/aKyx+0gpFHd34HWqvx9LPNwJOjHGu v3IwlhRItJxM+VAXQtlLIpc0ntGOdjjozvM7Fg2I=
Received: from [172.19.0.25] (bos-lpczi.kendall.corp.akamai.com [172.19.0.25]) by prod-mail-relay11.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E6131FC8E; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 17:17:11 +0000 (GMT)
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
References: <CABcZeBO2vVAb=0cPm91g5=9=6dp_JfiFNNQGs-RM9O0kZ2Zc5Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Benjamin Kaduk <bkaduk@akamai.com>
Message-ID: <57573467-35ec-f026-ebc7-3020bc0717ca@akamai.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 12:17:11 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBO2vVAb=0cPm91g5=9=6dp_JfiFNNQGs-RM9O0kZ2Zc5Q@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------57EA0B8D9A6501FEFB6940E4"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/zfUEVL_4-JexglXIbVzfH6mbQXw>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Issue 588: Code point assignment for ticket_early_data_info
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 17:17:14 -0000

On 08/30/2016 06:50 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/issues/588
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_tlswg_tls13-2Dspec_issues_588&d=DQMFaQ&c=96ZbZZcaMF4w0F4jpN6LZg&r=sssDLkeEEBWNIXmTsdpw8TZ3tAJx-Job4p1unc7rOhM&m=OYKlTldMw4JQ70u9GPUo_Mcv5XJALDhFEfHEGFg4sxU&s=QsszOoslegy3R6TjuMjZ2W961XyDrx_FomRj6TTfy9s&e=>
>
> I neglected to assign a code point for this in draft-15. I note,
> however, that
> we currently have it occupying a different code point space than hello
> extensions.
> I am sort of wondering if it would be more useful for them to be in
> the same
> space. Probably not, but I thought I would ask before assigning 1,
> which is
> the natural code point otherwise.
>
> https://tlswg.github.io/tls13-spec/#rfc.section.4.5.1
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tlswg.github.io_tls13-2Dspec_-23rfc.section.4.5.1&d=DQMFaQ&c=96ZbZZcaMF4w0F4jpN6LZg&r=sssDLkeEEBWNIXmTsdpw8TZ3tAJx-Job4p1unc7rOhM&m=OYKlTldMw4JQ70u9GPUo_Mcv5XJALDhFEfHEGFg4sxU&s=dAVInee1lQYCojdsHwo339WIxThaXLicpY-RPril0h4&e=>
>

It seems to make more sense to keep them in separate numberspaces, to me.

-Ben