[TLS] Combine TLS 1.0/1.1 into a single RFC

Yuhong Bao <yuhongbao_386@hotmail.com> Wed, 03 December 2014 02:59 UTC

Return-Path: <yuhongbao_386@hotmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F06561A0032 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Dec 2014 18:59:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.04
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.04 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BQSvlAatsltX for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Dec 2014 18:59:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from BLU004-OMC3S8.hotmail.com (blu004-omc3s8.hotmail.com []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 239FD1A0025 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Dec 2014 18:59:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from BLU177-W3 ([]) by BLU004-OMC3S8.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.22751); Tue, 2 Dec 2014 18:59:36 -0800
X-Originating-Email: [yuhongbao_386@hotmail.com]
Message-ID: <BLU177-W33AA4441670D2BCAE55F9C37B0@phx.gbl>
From: Yuhong Bao <yuhongbao_386@hotmail.com>
To: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 18:59:36 -0800
Importance: Normal
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Dec 2014 02:59:36.0339 (UTC) FILETIME=[2BF19630:01D00EA5]
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/zuQmpHuQPdo6ZKGdCy8afiVHmGk
Subject: [TLS] Combine TLS 1.0/1.1 into a single RFC
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 02:59:38 -0000

Given that TLS 1.0 is not dying soon, I wonder if it would make sense to combine TLS 1.0 and 1.1 into one RFC, given the minor changes involving the IV. This would include changing the mandatory to implement cipher suite for TLS 1.0 to TLS_RSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA.

Yuhong Bao