Re: [Drip] Revised Abstract -- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-drip-rid-18.txt
Robert Moskowitz <rgm@labs.htt-consult.com> Mon, 04 April 2022 15:03 UTC
Return-Path: <rgm@labs.htt-consult.com>
X-Original-To: tm-rid@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tm-rid@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACC653A0C77
for <tm-rid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Apr 2022 08:03:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.908
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.908 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id U1IQxdk0nXSZ for <tm-rid@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Mon, 4 Apr 2022 08:03:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from z9m9z.htt-consult.com (z9m9z.htt-consult.com [23.123.122.147])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256
bits)) (No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 488D53A0C68
for <tm-rid@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Apr 2022 08:03:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by z9m9z.htt-consult.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B930662762;
Mon, 4 Apr 2022 11:02:34 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at htt-consult.com
Received: from z9m9z.htt-consult.com ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (z9m9z.htt-consult.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with LMTP id J9VqEz6yBMSU; Mon, 4 Apr 2022 11:02:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [192.168.160.11] (unknown [192.168.160.11])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by z9m9z.htt-consult.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F15606256E;
Mon, 4 Apr 2022 11:02:21 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="------------ilAyvVbmbS4MpcUgU1fgtRyW"
Message-ID: <fe916ad5-144b-8356-69df-6009b2fbb055@labs.htt-consult.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2022 11:03:09 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/91.7.0
Content-Language: en-US
From: Robert Moskowitz <rgm@labs.htt-consult.com>
To: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
Cc: "tm-rid@ietf.org" <tm-rid@ietf.org>
References: <164874151970.19999.10082987967478424394@ietfa.amsl.com>
<d62d974b-82eb-3cba-8a9d-e1d44ae1c952@labs.htt-consult.com>
<31953_1648798887_6246ACA7_31953_361_4_1ab40a0c1e03458f9636a582de440d56@orange.com>
<31480_1648818466_6246F922_31480_173_1_1af11ed4ff834cddba6d86da2a176d74@orange.com>
<1dec78b3-283e-daae-691f-505367d5a5ca@labs.htt-consult.com>
In-Reply-To: <1dec78b3-283e-daae-691f-505367d5a5ca@labs.htt-consult.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tm-rid/1JjJhsNf7jA5hIFFMXeQjs1dEm0>
Subject: Re: [Drip] Revised Abstract -- Re: I-D Action:
draft-ietf-drip-rid-18.txt
X-BeenThere: tm-rid@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Drone Remote Identification Protocol <tm-rid.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tm-rid>,
<mailto:tm-rid-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tm-rid/>
List-Post: <mailto:tm-rid@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tm-rid-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tm-rid>,
<mailto:tm-rid-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2022 15:03:32 -0000
And on BMI3 on: HHITs self-attest to the included explicit hierarchy that provides Registrar discovery for 3rd-party identifier attestation. that should not be Registrar, rather registry. HHITs self-attest to the included explicit hierarchy that enables registry (e.g. DNS) discovery for 3rd-party identifier attestation. On 4/4/22 10:26, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > Removing citations and not exploding the following text are at odds, > as I was instructed that the abstract needs to say it is updating > prior rfcs. I would have to dig to find out where this was added, but > lets look at this: > > This document describes the use of Hierarchical Host Identity Tags > (HHITs), updating both [RFC7401] and [RFC7343], as self-asserting > IPv6 addresses and thereby a trustable identifier for use as the > Unmanned Aircraft System Remote Identification and tracking (UAS > RID). > > updating both HIPv2 and ORCHIDv2 ??? > > What are those, do I expand them to Host Identity Protocol version 2 > and Overlay Routable Cryptographic Hash Identifiers Version 2 ??? > > or > > updating existing standards defining the Host Identity Tag (HIT) and > its hash(ed) construction ??? > > The Introduction explains what and why Hierarchical Host Identity Tags > and thus needing to update 7401 and 7343. How these rfcs are updated > is covered in later sections. > > This is probably the hardest comment to resolved based on prior > comments... > > thanks > > > On 4/1/22 09:07, mohamed.boucadair@orange.com wrote: >> Standard >> >> Rob, >> >> Please find below my comments to -18: >> >> * pdf: >> https://github.com/boucadair/IETF-Drafts-Reviews/raw/master/draft-ietf-drip-rid-18-rev%20Med.pdf >> <https://github.com/boucadair/IETF-Drafts-Reviews/raw/master/draft-ietf-drip-rid-18-rev%20Med.pdf> >> * doc: >> https://github.com/boucadair/IETF-Drafts-Reviews/raw/master/draft-ietf-drip-rid-18-rev%20Med.doc >> >> >> Thank you. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Med >> >> *De :* Tm-rid <tm-rid-bounces@ietf.org> *De la part de* >> mohamed.boucadair@orange.com >> *Envoyé :* vendredi 1 avril 2022 09:41 >> *À :* Robert Moskowitz <rgm@labs.htt-consult.com>om>; tm-rid@ietf.org >> *Objet :* Re: [Drip] I-D Action: draft-ietf-drip-rid-18.txt >> >> Hi Bob, all, >> >> Thank you for implementing the list of agreed changes >> (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tm-rid/K1tOOlHcdsz1RdMZXsahP2qrBvA/). >> >> I invite everyone to carefully look into this version and share any >> remaining concern by ** April, 07 **. >> >> Absent any follow-up, we will request publication for this document >> next Friday 08/04. >> >> If we hear back from IANA before then, Rob will take care of the >> comments. If not, IANA-related comments will be addressed in due time >> (IETF LC). >> >> As I already reviewed the document several times, I may have only >> nits/minor fixes that I will directly share with Rob. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Med >> >> *De :* Tm-rid <tm-rid-bounces@ietf.org> *De la part de* Robert Moskowitz >> *Envoyé :* jeudi 31 mars 2022 17:50 >> *À :* tm-rid@ietf.org >> *Objet :* Re: [Drip] I-D Action: draft-ietf-drip-rid-18.txt >> >> Fixed outstanding items of supporting 8-bit HHIT Suite ID. Please >> check out that I now have this all done. Particularly sections 4.2 and 5. >> >> Moved HID registration to drip-registries (and changed reference to >> ietf-drip-registries!). That is no longer asking ICAO, here, to >> manage RAA space. >> >> Some other cleanup, please look at diff. >> >> Still to do: waiting for IANA review. So I anticipate a -19 >> >> On 3/31/22 11:45, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote: >> >> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. >> >> This draft is a work item of the Drone Remote ID Protocol WG of the IETF. >> >> Title : DRIP Entity Tag (DET) for Unmanned Aircraft System Remote Identification (UAS RID) >> >> Authors : Robert Moskowitz >> >> Stuart W. Card >> >> Adam Wiethuechter >> >> Andrei Gurtov >> >> Filename : draft-ietf-drip-rid-18.txt >> >> Pages : 33 >> >> Date : 2022-03-31 >> >> Abstract: >> >> This document describes the use of Hierarchical Host Identity Tags >> >> (HHITs), updating both [RFC7401] and [RFC7343], as self-asserting >> >> IPv6 addresses and thereby a trustable identifier for use as the >> >> Unmanned Aircraft System Remote Identification and tracking (UAS >> >> RID). Within the context of RID, HHITs will be called DRIP Entity >> >> Tags (DET). HHITs self-attest to the included explicit hierarchy >> >> that provides Registrar discovery for 3rd-party identifier >> >> attestation. >> >> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-drip-rid/ >> >> There is also an HTML version available at: >> >> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-drip-rid-18.html >> >> A diff from the previous version is available at: >> >> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-drip-rid-18 >> >> Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts >> >> -- >> Robert Moskowitz >> Owner >> HTT Consulting >> C: 248-219-2059 >> F: 248-968-2824 >> E: rgm@labs.htt-consult.com >> >> There's no limit to what can be accomplished if it doesn't matter who >> gets the credit >> >> _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ >> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc >> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler >> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, >> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. >> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; >> they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. >> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. >> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. >> Thank you. >> _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ >> >> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc >> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler >> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, >> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. >> >> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; >> they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. >> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. >> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. >> Thank you. >> > > -- Standard Robert Moskowitz Owner HTT Consulting C:248-219-2059 F:248-968-2824 E:rgm@labs.htt-consult.com There's no limit to what can be accomplished if it doesn't matter who gets the credit
- [Drip] I-D Action: draft-ietf-drip-rid-18.txt internet-drafts
- Re: [Drip] I-D Action: draft-ietf-drip-rid-18.txt Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [Drip] I-D Action: draft-ietf-drip-rid-18.txt mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Drip] I-D Action: draft-ietf-drip-rid-18.txt mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Drip] I-D Action: draft-ietf-drip-rid-18.txt Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [Drip] I-D Action: draft-ietf-drip-rid-18.txt mohamed.boucadair
- [Drip] Revised Abstract -- Re: I-D Action: draft-… Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [Drip] Revised Abstract -- Re: I-D Action: dr… Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [Drip] Revised Abstract -- Re: I-D Action: dr… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Drip] Revised Abstract -- Re: I-D Action: dr… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Drip] Revised Abstract -- Re: I-D Action: dr… Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [Drip] Revised Abstract -- Re: I-D Action: dr… Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [Drip] Revised Abstract -- Re: I-D Action: dr… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Drip] I-D Action: draft-ietf-drip-rid-18.txt Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [Drip] I-D Action: draft-ietf-drip-rid-18.txt mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Drip] I-D Action: draft-ietf-drip-rid-18.txt mohamed.boucadair