IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Drip] [Internet] Comments on Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-drip-arch-16.txt

Robert Moskowitz <rgm@labs.htt-consult.com> Wed, 10 November 2021 22:08 UTC

Return-Path: <rgm@labs.htt-consult.com>
X-Original-To: tm-rid@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tm-rid@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61DB33A1421 for <tm-rid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 14:08:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.229
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.229 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-3.33, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0_cx6JZv9XES for <tm-rid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 14:08:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from z9m9z.htt-consult.com (z9m9z.htt-consult.com [23.123.122.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 943D83A141F for <tm-rid@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 14:08:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by z9m9z.htt-consult.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8332E62718; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 17:07:05 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at htt-consult.com
Received: from z9m9z.htt-consult.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (z9m9z.htt-consult.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id HcOEcX1SjlVx; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 17:07:00 -0500 (EST)
Received: from lx140e.htt-consult.com (unknown [192.168.160.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by z9m9z.htt-consult.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 11A116247F; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 17:06:57 -0500 (EST)
To: "shuaiizhao(Shuai Zhao)" <shuaiizhao@tencent.com>, "tm-rid@ietf.org" <tm-rid@ietf.org>
References: <163518948657.6786.15619266169173545208@ietfa.amsl.com> <7a4130bc-97d2-624b-ac86-e91e97b9abdf@labs.htt-consult.com> <F6FE5A8C-DA0A-4310-874F-41140320BC33@tencent.com>
From: Robert Moskowitz <rgm@labs.htt-consult.com>
Message-ID: <f112c104-602f-b179-5387-48bad9cbf21f@labs.htt-consult.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2021 17:07:49 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <F6FE5A8C-DA0A-4310-874F-41140320BC33@tencent.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tm-rid/AHUNG5NgX9ytkCEd1N82Wq2XbHM>
Subject: Re: [Drip] [Internet] Comments on Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-drip-arch-16.txt
X-BeenThere: tm-rid@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Drone Remote Identification Protocol <tm-rid.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tm-rid>, <mailto:tm-rid-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tm-rid/>
List-Post: <mailto:tm-rid@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tm-rid-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tm-rid>, <mailto:tm-rid-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2021 22:08:12 -0000


On 11/10/21 3:56 PM, shuaiizhao(Shuai Zhao) wrote:
> Hi Bob and All,
>
>
> On 10/29/21, 12:41 PM, "Tm-rid on behalf of Robert Moskowitz" <tm-rid-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of rgm@labs.htt-consult.com> wrote:
>
>
>      Sec 3:
>
>      Should this really be sec 2.4?  Its content is Definitions of terms.
>
>      Seems I mentioned this in past reviews.
>
> Shuai/ Ah... It is not. I don’t remember Back when, we agreed this to be a separated section.  I added the editor-note-7 as reminder to us to make a final agreement.
>

The more I look at this, the more I feel that the current sec 3 should 
become sec 2.3.1

The contents of this section definitely constitute "Additional 
Definitions".  And all it does is introduce the terms with simple 
definition content.

Probably need AD/RFC-Editor to guide on this one.

Bob

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email