IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Drip] Comments on Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-drip-arch-16.txt

Robert Moskowitz <rgm@labs.htt-consult.com> Tue, 09 November 2021 10:57 UTC

Return-Path: <rgm@labs.htt-consult.com>
X-Original-To: tm-rid@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tm-rid@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52EC33A0E9C for <tm-rid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 02:57:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.228
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.228 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-3.33, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xzZGl8GabQ_Y for <tm-rid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 02:57:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from z9m9z.htt-consult.com (z9m9z.htt-consult.com [23.123.122.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 904C53A0E98 for <tm-rid@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 02:57:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by z9m9z.htt-consult.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E12662569; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 05:56:26 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at htt-consult.com
Received: from z9m9z.htt-consult.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (z9m9z.htt-consult.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 3E0NLs6snGMi; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 05:56:21 -0500 (EST)
Received: from lx140e.htt-consult.com (unknown [192.168.160.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by z9m9z.htt-consult.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3AF476247F; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 05:56:20 -0500 (EST)
To: "Stuart W. Card" <stu.card@axenterprize.com>, tm-rid@ietf.org
References: <163518948657.6786.15619266169173545208@ietfa.amsl.com> <7a4130bc-97d2-624b-ac86-e91e97b9abdf@labs.htt-consult.com> <1cb5a6a0-f955-40cf-92c2-d50e583b5461@axenterprize.com>
From: Robert Moskowitz <rgm@labs.htt-consult.com>
Message-ID: <f712e951-08d5-23c8-eb5e-654427b6a7cb@labs.htt-consult.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2021 05:57:11 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1cb5a6a0-f955-40cf-92c2-d50e583b5461@axenterprize.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------49AC0C34EE139C433CC6D2AC"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tm-rid/Q68H3Vqp46B3-Q82apvx9N-IZZc>
Subject: Re: [Drip] Comments on Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-drip-arch-16.txt
X-BeenThere: tm-rid@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Drone Remote Identification Protocol <tm-rid.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tm-rid>, <mailto:tm-rid-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tm-rid/>
List-Post: <mailto:tm-rid@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tm-rid-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tm-rid>, <mailto:tm-rid-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2021 10:57:32 -0000


On 11/9/21 1:18 AM, Stuart W. Card wrote:
> interspersed
>
> On 10/29/2021 3:41 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>> ...
>> in 1.3:
>> Where does "Surveillance Supplemental Data Service Provider (SDSP)" 
>> come from?  It is only mentioned here.  I do not see this term in 
>> F3411-19 or in WK63418 UAS Traffic Management (UTM) UAS Service 
>> Supplier (USS) Interoperability Specification ver 0.4.1 (in ballot).  
>> SDSP normally means Supplemental Data Service Provider, so here it 
>> probably should be SSDSP?
>> ...
>> I like the term and should "upgrade" from just SDSP in crowd-source-rid?
>> Should, can we, reference a source for this concept?
>
> Surveillance SDSP is a subclass of SDSP; the acronym refers to the 
> larger class. SDSP can be found in the FAA UTM CONOPS. Surveillance 
> SDSP is yet another ASTM work group item.

Can we refer to a specific ASTM WK or similar?  Which subgroup of F38?


>
>>     A DRIP registration process based on the explicit hierarchy within a
>>     HHIT provides manageable uniqueness of the HI for the HHIT (defense
>>     against a cryptographic hash second pre-image attach on the HHIT...
>> /s/attach/attack/  It was correct in -15.
>
> Sorry, I gave Shuai some suggested text to fix something else, but I 
> inserted this typographical error in it. :-(
>

-- 
Standard Robert Moskowitz
Owner
HTT Consulting
C:248-219-2059
F:248-968-2824
E:rgm@labs.htt-consult.com

There's no limit to what can be accomplished if it doesn't matter who 
gets the credit

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email