IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tm-rid] Some updates and work on HHITs

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 21 August 2019 23:36 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: tm-rid@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tm-rid@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0B11120043 for <tm-rid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 16:36:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PiyGMq6po-TU for <tm-rid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 16:35:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [176.58.120.209]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B3D7120100 for <tm-rid@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 16:35:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dooku.sandelman.ca (unknown [142.169.78.130]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 650501F45E; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 23:35:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dooku.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 440BD3B61; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 19:35:37 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Robert Moskowitz <rgm@labs.htt-consult.com>
cc: "Wiethuechter, Adam" <adam.wiethuechter@axenterprize.com>, "tm-rid@ietf.org" <tm-rid@ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <93528895-aacb-d9cc-ea4d-0c8661ea17f7@labs.htt-consult.com>
References: <d04d866c-24cc-eb6c-219f-9eb511160a87@labs.htt-consult.com> <CA+r8TqX52fyPpRBW6=UnnqV19qtSPc9u5gqAs7YoeKhz2aY67w@mail.gmail.com> <CA+r8TqWZmGJGhJjreNfC+k8GwmDPF7Ds+LguJbwtuRRvc2Lkow@mail.gmail.com> <93528895-aacb-d9cc-ea4d-0c8661ea17f7@labs.htt-consult.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Robert Moskowitz <rgm@labs.htt-consult.com> message dated "Tue, 20 Aug 2019 17:26:59 -0400."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.6; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 19:35:37 -0400
Message-ID: <20057.1566430537@dooku.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tm-rid/tRRZiWwdRl8jgPXsJRzBaDO0KAI>
Subject: Re: [Tm-rid] Some updates and work on HHITs
X-BeenThere: tm-rid@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Trustworthy Multipurpose RemoteID <tm-rid.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tm-rid>, <mailto:tm-rid-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tm-rid/>
List-Post: <mailto:tm-rid@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tm-rid-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tm-rid>, <mailto:tm-rid-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 23:36:01 -0000

    >     Attached is the latest version of the HHIT generation script
    > (2019.08a13) along with a script to search for duplicate HITs/HHITs
    > when a data set is generated.
    
Robert Moskowitz <rgm@labs.htt-consult.com> wrote:
    > Per the collision formula, the probability of collision of 1M in a
    > potential population of 2^64 is:

    > 2.7x10^-6 %

    > That is basically a zero probability. IF you had collisions then I
    > would be suspicious of some underlying assumption.

I don't really understand the operational need to generate a set of millions
of HHITs. 

-- 
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [ 
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        | network architect  [ 
]     mcr@sandelman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email