IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tm-rid] HHIT trust proof for Auth messages

Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca> Thu, 03 October 2019 22:22 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: tm-rid@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tm-rid@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDD7E120043 for <tm-rid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 15:22:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wC8-ooer9UkQ for <tm-rid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 15:22:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [176.58.120.209]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B03012001E for <tm-rid@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 15:22:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dooku.sandelman.ca (unknown [207.164.135.99]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 896BF1F47F for <tm-rid@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 22:22:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dooku.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 7239854E3; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 23:23:14 +0100 (WEST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
To: "tm-rid@ietf.org" <tm-rid@ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <CA+r8TqXRE3uR7TcqXCbuKTBQsvniFS1312mvbZQnfgThbPZH=w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <c8342d06-203f-6f51-d227-12501a291fc7@labs.htt-consult.com> <CA+r8TqVNVOOCAipmTN5BqH3UGnpezsL748iLWnc7Ra=rVtD9sg@mail.gmail.com> <5994016b-0006-f45c-3f53-6094ed768b3c@labs.htt-consult.com> <CA+r8TqU-nhUgLv_eGYMTh6kCoX6UnDH=4XznR168Pvp780==9g@mail.gmail.com> <e6c8facf-3c96-5c29-bd75-30ed09594d41@labs.htt-consult.com> <CA+r8TqXRE3uR7TcqXCbuKTBQsvniFS1312mvbZQnfgThbPZH=w@mail.gmail.com>
Comments: In-reply-to "Wiethuechter, Adam" <adam.wiethuechter@axenterprize.com> message dated "Thu, 03 Oct 2019 15:46:06 -0400."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.6; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2019 18:23:14 -0400
Message-ID: <24521.1570141394@dooku.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tm-rid/uJwePTEgt0Deowq-sK0662n3uGA>
Subject: Re: [Tm-rid] HHIT trust proof for Auth messages
X-BeenThere: tm-rid@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Trustworthy Multipurpose RemoteID <tm-rid.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tm-rid>, <mailto:tm-rid-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tm-rid/>
List-Post: <mailto:tm-rid@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tm-rid-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tm-rid>, <mailto:tm-rid-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2019 22:22:34 -0000

Wiethuechter, Adam <adam.wiethuechter@axenterprize.com> wrote:
    > On a more general note; the ASTM proposed standard I can confirm is 5
    > pages long (17 + 23 *4 = 109 bytes). The reasoning behind this and
    > possible paths forward are still being looked at.

Are there bytes in the first page that are not under our control, but could
be included in a FEC, such that it really looks like 23*5?  That would be
easier for most algorithms.

-- 
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [ 
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        | network architect  [ 
]     mcr@sandelman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email