IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tm-rid] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on charter-ietf-drip-00-01: (with COMMENT)

"Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com> Thu, 20 February 2020 16:04 UTC

Return-Path: <evyncke@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: tm-rid@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tm-rid@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1F031200F3; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 08:04:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.498
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.498 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=QFfVVm/9; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=DcI3Iqgr
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6aAcAc0CujU5; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 08:04:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 857E9120058; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 08:04:10 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4052; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1582214650; x=1583424250; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=u9VZ3JzJhAzizL1C0ROfrOLQPx6yI7zfX6yamVuuNS8=; b=QFfVVm/9NSqoB+J98TEfG6Ox38E+2VCXZdg67lUEvbBZMKPvRWvmw1rM cD8XoxynM4yQ9Urn/AThBD1NIT5J3y8A7mgbkGElqc+TABaMc3RdCN6sG s+3SaVcUWGP4BPYwvc72gF6tta4f8ZPM2m6YE8H8dp4GqHNfpZDHB5oyR E=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:7hSjUh23zYYnODnxsmDT+zVfbzU7u7jyIg8e44YmjLQLaKm44pD+JxKHt+51ggrPWoPWo7JfhuzavrqoeFRI4I3J8RVgOIdJSwdDjMwXmwI6B8vQBFPqKvXpYgQxHd9JUxlu+HToeUU=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BgCACirE5e/4sNJK1lHQEBAQkBEQUFAYF7gVRQBWxYIAQLKoQUg0YDinKCOoEmlxKBQoEQA1QJAQEBDAEBGAsKAgQBAYRAAheBcSQ4EwIDDQEBBQEBAQIBBQRthTcBC4VnAgEDAQEQEREMAQEsCwEPAgEIGgImAgICJQsVEAIEDgUigwQBgkoDLgEOow8CgTmIYnWBMoJ/AQEFgUNBg0IYggwDBoEOKowkGoFBP4ERJwwUghc1PoJkAQEDAYEsARIBIReCeTKCLI1LJC+CRp81CoI8h1CKYoQyHIJJiBuQSY5wiHuSSwIEAgQFAg4BAQWBaSJncXAVOyoBgkFQGA2OHQwXFYM7hRSFQXSBKYtDgjIBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.70,464,1574121600"; d="scan'208";a="727419607"
Received: from alln-core-6.cisco.com ([173.36.13.139]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 20 Feb 2020 16:04:06 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (xch-rcd-003.cisco.com [173.37.102.13]) by alln-core-6.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 01KG46r7002202 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 20 Feb 2020 16:04:06 GMT
Received: from xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) by XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (173.37.102.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 10:04:05 -0600
Received: from xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) by xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 10:04:04 -0600
Received: from NAM11-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (173.37.151.57) by xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 10:04:04 -0600
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=d87+fpkfRuBUwq/Q9pTta0scVI31oEy5ElKE/y4bjn4QQ8E7ZaU4u4pKjywkefqTmtDzJ4fc81TE03izaxIdRnOQrw4mtZkf1st9AlBfzri1SG4gy4MoMXvEuea+KYOU8FlurNFWVcoBWghvdCsH8gxHtIWvyyiMBIzK5/Hm9Zcx0d1xfhm8f6BUtU3QiF0Jys5CPAHXH8kRkh6BHtyLctgyarLapbBTERL4TchJK9xqckKyJQgB1u5dj3YYRwZOra2TZ29IeKbWtaQVXFqlgGQ8bQR5Pp8FtDm8d6xkHvH54BgpRBp4uV1fhMdkjeO9Y6Se7wLhqjh7aub0y6pn1A==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=u9VZ3JzJhAzizL1C0ROfrOLQPx6yI7zfX6yamVuuNS8=; b=IY9TReB9FsfRgYWzsrihEeqtrPLsoijFgKI4cRXExKAhgqkQxqn6bUAeURlzog/KFA6Hpc+k5we3ClhBBoEUWRMZOx1RSqR38axEVsGjewtLbn0DiG5KbXXZt7LxYLJVuwjReLZhguP9sk1slTYKRbxIuUn5FQ8b3dHEyY4GtD0GNnmeWe2z+7NLtTb/cG0SebylFa2gghgbDNJoeiP9Dq2+Is5PnoHRezRvI7ZVErXK7Y0xo6jdYAPWj+Dvbo6Fjhc/RH4SZVSzMwC2wm+RsjvVpXnZCQ+VRPAVCHcmz+kBcRdGOCMwYgERgwGrpBL0Q42/cuCQVWxMU6eIoxgP5w==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=u9VZ3JzJhAzizL1C0ROfrOLQPx6yI7zfX6yamVuuNS8=; b=DcI3IqgrHPI2M6YZNhavVpzvT24g2AvzNx1c9KUxyEBmlZ7CCMLQAxIKfdOArg/E4yjvNfN1N2wNIVPz3wsMmkwf7ltfjkx5d9wVLr13xa1I1wUj72tSb7WkYyaD/4HrWgGKZjIue942YQsfN/SqVFHC43aNz+4WKQr6mWenG1w=
Received: from DM5PR11MB1753.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:3:10d::13) by DM5PR11MB2010.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:3:12::21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2729.25; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 16:04:03 +0000
Received: from DM5PR11MB1753.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::680d:e22e:72d5:67ca]) by DM5PR11MB1753.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::680d:e22e:72d5:67ca%3]) with mapi id 15.20.2729.033; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 16:04:03 +0000
From: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com>
To: "tm-rid@ietf.org" <tm-rid@ietf.org>
CC: "drip-chairs@ietf.org" <drip-chairs@ietf.org>, Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
Thread-Topic: [Tm-rid] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on charter-ietf-drip-00-01: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHV56wYG6a5vaHXk02XdMBYJR5DbKgj4Y8AgABumAA=
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 16:04:03 +0000
Message-ID: <567F8A04-5739-4436-8D56-722A2CEDEB75@cisco.com>
References: <158217542781.17775.11240749461767725731.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <471CDB97-3D49-470D-8201-194508365E8C@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <471CDB97-3D49-470D-8201-194508365E8C@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: fr-BE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.22.0.200209
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=evyncke@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:c0c1:36:9994:8a6f:a879:1893]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 74e7f752-e624-4b94-9031-08d7b61e8191
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DM5PR11MB2010:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM5PR11MB2010D07436157ED8DC392CE3A9130@DM5PR11MB2010.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 031996B7EF
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(366004)(136003)(39860400002)(376002)(396003)(346002)(199004)(189003)(8676002)(81156014)(966005)(6916009)(8936002)(6486002)(33656002)(53546011)(316002)(36756003)(6506007)(81166006)(2906002)(54906003)(478600001)(6512007)(186003)(91956017)(66946007)(76116006)(66476007)(2616005)(66446008)(64756008)(4326008)(66556008)(86362001)(71200400001)(5660300002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:DM5PR11MB2010; H:DM5PR11MB1753.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: LmJQ8lgEXADCcVAaNGBctVK4bPrXr1Z78xl4+qKYFSEK6tgW7QXJYRYdlA0c1KhjB6vo/cx4XXEyc2sENW/uF+8ulveShrVhCHUabeNxj/afHFsnTFpbTOosVp9YyKGy/Ox2k6XacDvksM0c9BU4JvmsPKs9LzCOOZq6YmmzOj/aOHEmWFEwjpNZquzFrLYcpLVlCV+lNocPcMi5jkWAjA==
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <7F475693E09C424C9C41AA4E168AC1A5@namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 74e7f752-e624-4b94-9031-08d7b61e8191
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 20 Feb 2020 16:04:03.4229 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: XNzKY4wFb8Ibi2jZyUusSokzocjjrS/8riLNSwqu9n/JEBCz2cIBNbXjqukmyUUlqW9jFCHByVwMMvrUp/AAwQ==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM5PR11MB2010
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.13, xch-rcd-003.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-6.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tm-rid/xOwU8q29lvyblCOYvbVhG78gmGE>
Subject: Re: [Tm-rid] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on charter-ietf-drip-00-01: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: tm-rid@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Trustworthy Multipurpose RemoteID <tm-rid.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tm-rid>, <mailto:tm-rid-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tm-rid/>
List-Post: <mailto:tm-rid@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tm-rid-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tm-rid>, <mailto:tm-rid-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 16:04:13 -0000

BTW, the charter has been provisionally approved today by the IESG (Yeah!)  ***IF*** the charter fix the ambiguities below on Friday or on Monday. So, we have a little more time

-éric

On 20/02/2020, 10:28, "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com> wrote:

    Alissa and Ben,
    
    Thank you for your comments and let's work to fix all ambiguities... 
    
    TM-RID list members can you please comment on Alissa & Ben's reviews ?
    - Alissa: we need to expand UAS as "Unmanned Aircraft System" at first use even if only to avoid being ambiguous
    - Alissa: what is the subject of the "need to": is it "these requirements" or "those associated to the UAS identifier" or "UAS identifier", let's be clear on this
    - Ben: indeed milestone are quite optimistic... adoption should be target and request for publication 6 month later ?
    - Ben: should RID be trustworthy (my guess is yes of course as this is the main purpose of this group)
    
    The DRIP charter will be reviewed today at 15H00 UTC, so, a prompt reply from the proponents of the list will be appreciated
    
    -éric
    
    On 20/02/2020, 06:10, "Tm-rid on behalf of Alissa Cooper via Datatracker" <tm-rid-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
    
        Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
        charter-ietf-drip-00-01: No Objection
        
        When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
        email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
        introductory paragraph, however.)
        
        
        
        The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
        https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-drip/
        
        
        
        ----------------------------------------------------------------------
        COMMENT:
        ----------------------------------------------------------------------
        
        Two questions about this:
        
        "* Requirements: the WG is expected to provide an informational document that
        lists the technical requirements for applying IETF protocols to the UAS Remote
        Identification (UAS RID) - that is the system for identifying UA during flight
        by other parties. These requirements will also include those associated to the
        UAS Identifier that need to both meet some constraints as well as some specific
        properties."
        
        Is UA distinct from UAS?
        
        The last sentence doesn't parse properly for me. What is the subject of "need
        to"? Is this saying "requirements ... need to ... meet some constraints ...
        [and meet] some specific properties"? What does that mean?
        
        
        -- 
        Tm-rid mailing list
        Tm-rid@ietf.org
        https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tm-rid

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email