IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tm-rid] 1st steps - time lines and drafts

Robert Moskowitz <rgm@labs.htt-consult.com> Thu, 01 August 2019 21:03 UTC

Return-Path: <rgm@labs.htt-consult.com>
X-Original-To: tm-rid@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tm-rid@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8727120230 for <tm-rid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Aug 2019 14:03:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZS11x_mG6gyO for <tm-rid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Aug 2019 14:02:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from z9m9z.htt-consult.com (z9m9z.htt-consult.com [23.123.122.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5175412022E for <tm-rid@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Aug 2019 14:02:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by z9m9z.htt-consult.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA74D60D1B; Thu, 1 Aug 2019 17:02:58 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at htt-consult.com
Received: from z9m9z.htt-consult.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (z9m9z.htt-consult.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id VGCGyr7urLT2; Thu, 1 Aug 2019 17:02:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from lx140e.htt-consult.com (unknown [192.168.160.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by z9m9z.htt-consult.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 42F7560964; Thu, 1 Aug 2019 17:02:52 -0400 (EDT)
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, tm-rid@ietf.org
References: <30eb80bc-8f7a-e550-d081-547b8bf0dbed@labs.htt-consult.com> <41dbac5b-0c59-e470-f1c3-933a9dbc14d0@labs.htt-consult.com> <CAKM0pYNsj95RCnQAW7hggOfAQXRHCxXbC8JEUK_VNG3E8b1wXQ@mail.gmail.com> <bf4deda6-2872-2e1d-32a0-8248e66c5b7a@labs.htt-consult.com> <8916.1564693021@localhost>
From: Robert Moskowitz <rgm@labs.htt-consult.com>
Message-ID: <9e4beb90-2048-d1e0-472b-e8ec03d8cf27@labs.htt-consult.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2019 17:02:51 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <8916.1564693021@localhost>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tm-rid/yU8p1WBIStuoYudlXvXN_lPu1Z8>
Subject: Re: [Tm-rid] 1st steps - time lines and drafts
X-BeenThere: tm-rid@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Trustworthy Multipurpose RemoteID <tm-rid.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tm-rid>, <mailto:tm-rid-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tm-rid/>
List-Post: <mailto:tm-rid@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tm-rid-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tm-rid>, <mailto:tm-rid-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2019 21:03:01 -0000


On 8/1/19 4:57 PM, Michael Richardson wrote:
> Robert Moskowitz <rgm@labs.htt-consult.com> wrote:
>      > COID is significantly better than X.509 for constrained environments.
>      > Not as good as 'raw' structures introduced by HIP and used elsewhere
>      > since, but if you need the full capability of a digital certificate in
>      > a 'new', constrained, environment, then it demands careful
>      > consideration.  Of course there are no PKI products that support it.
>      > This too is a consideration.
>
> So, no installed based to fight with :-)

One would hope so.  But a pki provider that wanted to spin up something 
for COID would carry some baggage.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email