Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] Notes for 12Feb tools call

Eric Rescorla <> Fri, 08 February 2019 17:20 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id E842712867A for <>; Fri, 8 Feb 2019 09:20:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u34WpM4so8iG for <>; Fri, 8 Feb 2019 09:20:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5861A1200ED for <>; Fri, 8 Feb 2019 09:20:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: by with SMTP id p6so3127492lfc.1 for <>; Fri, 08 Feb 2019 09:20:42 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=frv2KHj6Zb8to5WuhtIW6by85J/0+EjpN3qP8avnCD8=; b=Sjgno/C3DAnDpo/otXg0jJGH0yF/ljm8tyZrA7RG3vG7ltGS5MW/BNnBizlFjSTdAR NjaBGy97VbqIbvOD02SZGgB1QzNp610gOItdVJJab3rIOUTsucmaqGZb41kUF1XcrILa iDJ04DUenJEg8XFPh9IBsiqwb/cLoKygtGuuCR9rMVS2hOGZmSbBAm2JpH8YLcYRRPUt LNJ9SqwHDdGxiXXT0iQmCvsGo0YqhA3XZqF885Gbcfo3aDWHVw3pQLI48lNNOyWph60i leqQyDbfh2nOnVkiiI9I8cLNYgCazBYdLxFG2XAJpFB/GCYxY+BD84l7/uWe31MUbk2o 3alw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=frv2KHj6Zb8to5WuhtIW6by85J/0+EjpN3qP8avnCD8=; b=lx2Vmro424Z9/EnyHXKjv+kfz+I4seqEUqt6ViTDQrpFeLBhMQJq48pGDpYTORunih q8j0uvCTf0zCEShUPWdCe0r23V2TSzGA6odJBQDKkkDdOmcJVpSszd5HZc9fcoP8ABVZ gziVuWI44Z16rwxLbFpcXgEt3424bfozy9wUdf0qbDO0qACN7NDtN1BqM5hi4b8YyfeH 3q3kKYz/37w+T+aXv/JWANdhgQbBULF5J2t09O0FxN5/q6SdJmq29KV9WYtgbvGWbGz8 Tfrm04coN/QAmWP8E0bHkvvq+VVKk87NaR4uUD7OI8KPjxQJWWZpMAPlAiFtW3ikEFA2 SaKw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAuYzJAL21JTvfSo3EqVyj5k8qzopK/0Le9tS8xd3WhBEGZPc/W/Y CESnV9sa/pu2PX37wW9DOYvjiwD5nfP1xTgaWesYeA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IYfmMXCza2p6zz9JAMwT40A38xBfoCOlo084emG8ZMlPXJxx2dYmotQ23DxS3ctdD/rHP3o9m46bZoO6+8bbv0=
X-Received: by 2002:a19:6a05:: with SMTP id u5mr15224896lfu.123.1549646439858; Fri, 08 Feb 2019 09:20:39 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
From: Eric Rescorla <>
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2019 09:20:00 -0800
Message-ID: <>
To: Robert Sparks <>
Cc: IETF Tools Development <>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000009361900581652d85"
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] Notes for 12Feb tools call
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Tools Development list server <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2019 17:20:46 -0000

On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 8:51 AM Robert Sparks <> wrote:

> # IETF Website #
> Torchbox has completed their last major deliverable (upgrading the
> website to a more modern version of wagtail). There are a small number
> of tickets related to documentation and requests for information we
> should have before shifting the code into our own public code
> repository. Note that the wagtail project continues to issue new
> releases. The project with torchbox brought us to wagtail 2.2.2. The
> current release now is 2.4.
> However, we are blocked on deploying this latest deliverable. The way we
> are serving python applications via Apache right now (mod_wsgi) only
> allows the use of one version of python. Many of our applications are on
> Python 2.7 right now. This includes the datatracker and the mailarchive.
> Wagtail, on the other hand, dropped support for python 2.7 at Wagtail
> 2.0. Waiting until we have all exisiting deployed applications ported to
> python 3 to deploy the deliverable from Torchbox is exceedingly
> suboptimal. It will delay the current plan for the tools-team to take
> over maintenance of the website code and start adding features the
> secretariat has asked for. We've started conversations about what other
> options we have besides waiting for everything to be ported to python 3.

Why does the version of datatracker impact the version of Wagtail we run?
They seem to be on different hosts, so can't they run different versions of

> # Yangcatalog #
> We've shifted the plan for short-term deployment and development to
> occur using the existing externally hosted server.

Can you provide some more background for this? Why can't this be moved to
an IETF server (or IETF-managed cloud)


The meeting application improvement SoW is essentially ready to issue.
> I have text from Ekr to work into the RPC security code review SoW. The
> RPC has asked that we hold off issuing that RFP until some changes
> related to the new format are better integrated into their repository so
> that the review focuses more on the code that will actually be used.
> The Inline-Errata SoW is still under review and has several unresolved
> comments. The lastest version is at
> <
> One of the major observations in the comments is that this project is
> focusing on the existing (old-format) publication format, and is not
> targetting or taking advantage of the new format in any way. That's
> intentional. We need to have some run-time experience with the new
> format before we can sensibly ask a contractor to work on inlining
> errata into it. We plan to learn from this project, and apply what we
> learn into the new format with a future project.
> The next SoW to be developed is for IANA expert review tracking.
> _______________________________________________
> TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT mailing list