IETF Logo Mail Archive

[TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] Future tools call times (was Re: Hello tools-development)

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Tue, 09 April 2019 19:42 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FB57120236 for <tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Apr 2019 12:42:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.679
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.679 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OHXs030bKofO for <tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Apr 2019 12:42:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F398F1202F7 for <tools-development@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Apr 2019 12:42:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unescapeable.local ([47.186.39.7]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x39JgUud006952 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 9 Apr 2019 14:42:31 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1554838951; bh=wcrXmbYRQt3ylTpnPaahuzgkvW0AkpT1p5bTo8Yc7qA=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=cAnOtVvDOfv/2I9TjvJYk1VPlQpApPzJd9/7ffXfpPEFQeexV3OdrOy7WKlkaEUR5 XeOiZ5syHO6SKav2dsRdMWDe7ZunGdRLU6qYZWWchA2UkmP0iVAfap9E/zL8lPHUk/ oZfNXZSkn7iLq7JUwgjlz5slFxAE02ScoybOiLMw=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.39.7] claimed to be unescapeable.local
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, IETF Tools Development <tools-development@ietf.org>
References: <B3F5CCFE-F252-4157-B125-523EDB282579@mnot.net>
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <6709316c-ef68-397d-25c1-8de8af226b27@nostrum.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2019 14:42:29 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <B3F5CCFE-F252-4157-B125-523EDB282579@mnot.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-development/NyLMi2A_YPh8dJdvGJXHP8wMGkY>
Subject: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] Future tools call times (was Re: Hello tools-development)
X-BeenThere: tools-development@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Tools Development list server <tools-development.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-development>, <mailto:tools-development-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-development/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-development@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-development-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-development>, <mailto:tools-development-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2019 19:42:33 -0000

Hi Mark -

There was a tools team call today - I figure you missed it because it 
was at an awful time for where you are on the planet (3am if I did the 
math right).

The primary point of the calls is to go over in-flight and upcoming 
activities to help make it less likely that some of us surprise the 
rest. Sometimes we make priority adjustments during the calls.

I think we should discuss the call schedule (but I don't have the token 
to change it). We have regular participants in Sweden, Belgium, and the 
range of CONUS timezones. From our experience with trying to schedule 
IAB calls, I know there's no _good_ time, but is there a time that has 
worked better than others?

RjS

On 4/8/19 6:48 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I've just joined the tools-development team, and hope I can add some value; I have some background in systems administration and web ops.
>
> I'm just getting up to speed (and would love any pointers to help in that process!), but one immediate question -- in the RFP that just went out, the timeline seems unusually tight. Is there a reason for that?
>
> I ask because having such short timelines can severely impact participation.
>
> Cheers,
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
>
> _______________________________________________
> TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT mailing list
> TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-development

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email