IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] Getting a list of recently adopted document

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Thu, 11 April 2019 13:42 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2DB11202D3 for <tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 06:42:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.979
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.979 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0XScYkKGvXkJ for <tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 06:42:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E10591202D1 for <tools-development@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 06:42:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unescapeable.local ([47.186.39.7]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x3BDgblP024768 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for <tools-development@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 08:42:38 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1554990158; bh=4Ajim5Z52jw0LeaZJXWAefxzJA9+orx36gi3wJ5mLGc=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=U+T28nt2vEkePr7rNO4KzaJhCylWRgAZJx6LmYphJzlfRyoeGRM6u6kgEK6WTjY1k Kbb1Zv3LnMa/8URhhMZ8UDI8LARK+XgPeAKSqaAHVxvfAGhb2iaJditqg/YaDyFox0 VXXA3JpqsHj5Li51EISOD7ddbXOhHO4wBb2Do4bY=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.39.7] claimed to be unescapeable.local
To: tools-development@ietf.org
References: <359EC4B99E040048A7131E0F4E113AFC01B33272D6@marchand>
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <64836652-8818-3aed-e807-f20c92e85e83@nostrum.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 08:42:35 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <359EC4B99E040048A7131E0F4E113AFC01B33272D6@marchand>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-development/OolatzzwnDB18iTOJy-I423ODyk>
Subject: Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] Getting a list of recently adopted document
X-BeenThere: tools-development@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Tools Development list server <tools-development.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-development>, <mailto:tools-development-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-development/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-development@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-development-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-development>, <mailto:tools-development-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 13:42:42 -0000

It would not be hard to build, and Spencer gave us very early warning on 
the idea, so it's mostly thought through already.

But we need to be sure we build what's really wanted, and advertise it 
correctly.

As stated, you want this list to be only _IETF_ WG adoptions, correct? 
We would not include IRTF RG adoptions (or IAB or any other stream), 
correct?

RjS

On 4/11/19 6:29 AM, Roman Danyliw wrote:
> Hi Tools Team!
>
> I'm helping Greg Wood launch an "IETF Notifications of Emerging Work" project.  The thinking is we'd like to have a way to easily summarize new work the IETF is starting.  To make this tractable, "new work" has been defined as all of the drafts that have been recently adopted per a given look-back period by a WG (i.e., draft-ietf-<wg name>-*-00).
>
> The channels in which this would be summarized/announced is yet to be determined, but the raw data required per -00 draft is the draft name, WG, title, and abstract.
>
> Doing this manually wouldn't be feasible, so we were looking for assistance with automation.  How far off is such a regular report from something that already exists?
>
> Roman
>
> _______________________________________________
> TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT mailing list
> TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-development

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email