Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] Tools Call Agenda -- 10 September 2019 at 1:00 Eastern

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Mon, 09 September 2019 16:34 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CCD512007A for <tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 09:34:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.978
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yuIxWfM65h4L for <tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 09:34:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF4021201EA for <tools-development@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 09:34:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unescapeable.local ([47.186.30.41]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x89GYrhX015771 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 9 Sep 2019 11:34:54 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1568046895; bh=0Wdmbb0yo0qayTkBqkfjMRwjl4Zs3TI5sBGSlTA3SR8=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=KtL6nYA+6mBsLLmBuRMv55rv9+S1b3sDCbg67Z6AJj+JEv+mRNfQME/N9Mh+BpSgP 5l5ZuQxnagkrizuP+51Q9s+eu32SFU3YB7vd6ui0yOwE6aLoOtOSWXgeXb+vWEc2nw YmgqeVcaQoFfEvhUQQ8GY6XLKW4kY0GYq0P/wBhI=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.30.41] claimed to be unescapeable.local
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Cc: IETF Tools Development <tools-development@ietf.org>
References: <57225470-D9D0-4066-91D8-26BCF66C67D6@vigilsec.com> <4b712824-1ce0-6a47-d512-685c11aac67b@nostrum.com> <61C5B0EC-17DE-46A2-BBF6-CF5E9F952289@vigilsec.com>
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <f27e7598-8379-b999-ad8c-b56ca4761c37@nostrum.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2019 11:34:53 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <61C5B0EC-17DE-46A2-BBF6-CF5E9F952289@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------AB90A62A00A4344FAA441A26"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-development/OzUjjLMu9_K4-YB6oNYkGeORqAs>
Subject: Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] Tools Call Agenda -- 10 September 2019 at 1:00 Eastern
X-BeenThere: tools-development@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Tools Development list server <tools-development.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-development>, <mailto:tools-development-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-development/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-development@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-development-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-development>, <mailto:tools-development-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2019 16:34:57 -0000

On 9/9/19 11:28 AM, Russ Housley wrote:
>
>
>> On Sep 9, 2019, at 11:33 AM, Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com 
>> <mailto:rjsparks@nostrum.com>> wrote:
>>
>>> 3. RFC Services Projects
>>>    - RPC testing of new RFC format tools -- Heather and Robert
>>
>> This has mostly been going well. The questions and change requests 
>> are showing convergence, and I think we're ready to go.
>>
>> That said, there was a memory-exhaustion issue noted last night with 
>> rfc-xmldiff. Glen and SoaringHawk are discussing it. I expect it will 
>> be addressed quickly.
>>
>>>    - Security Review of RPC Tools -- Robert and Heather
>> On hold until after the swtichover.
>
> Yes, I am aware.  I wonder if we should put the RFP out soon, so that 
> we have a contractor selected to do the work before the end of the year.
The concern earlier was that questions related to the RFP would distract 
the RPC during the changeover. But since that changeover is expected 
next week, perhaps we can get this issued immediately after?
>
> Russ
>