Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] Hello tools-development

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Tue, 09 April 2019 23:36 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0285D120478 for <tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Apr 2019 16:36:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.979
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.979 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6ggJAbBqGoUT for <tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Apr 2019 16:36:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB49F120475 for <tools-development@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Apr 2019 16:36:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.3.102] ([47.186.39.7]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x39NacOa045947 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 9 Apr 2019 18:36:39 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1554852999; bh=SiERfJF2OdVNGng7PzjqQlKiYupl9NxryTGhbxnjopQ=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=Rlbj4bMhuJqGutOBRKqCMeiGPhnG3x0s5VUs+1oo8ukjabokgLFL1mVe/OIVQLJ1Q qGqHpAe5W+XkcA7f2oOZu5VOvNNW2Gk6nZ1Ua7NTbVH+fQxkKGXUmapedriwyzN02b 0Phwi9uODCvyCs2rSSMRej6Bv+NcgKg0DSCm3ppg=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.39.7] claimed to be [192.168.3.102]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (16D57)
In-Reply-To: <F69B1E9A-A7BF-4562-95F3-24E4201B4552@mnot.net>
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 18:36:38 -0500
Cc: tools-development@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <4178B245-B0CD-40A6-8FA3-922AAB7ECD0F@nostrum.com>
References: <B3F5CCFE-F252-4157-B125-523EDB282579@mnot.net> <e57ef465-91f1-00c8-2779-101e7b2a103c@nostrum.com> <F69B1E9A-A7BF-4562-95F3-24E4201B4552@mnot.net>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-development/Wu5Cdcg-VOVSXALUFF8jJfxclGM>
Subject: Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] Hello tools-development
X-BeenThere: tools-development@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Tools Development list server <tools-development.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-development>, <mailto:tools-development-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-development/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-development@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-development-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-development>, <mailto:tools-development-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2019 23:36:42 -0000

Understood. We definitely did not plan to send that message. 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Apr 9, 2019, at 6:28 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> 
> Hey Robert,
> 
> Thanks. I don't know of anyone in particular right now. It's just that an RPF with such a short timeline usually carries the unspoken message "don't bother applying, we already have someone in mind", and I don't think that's a very good message for us to be sending.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> 
>> On 10 Apr 2019, at 5:31 am, Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> On 4/8/19 6:48 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>>> Hi everyone,
>>> 
>>> I've just joined the tools-development team, and hope I can add some value; I have some background in systems administration and web ops.
>>> 
>>> I'm just getting up to speed (and would love any pointers to help in that process!), but one immediate question -- in the RFP that just went out, the timeline seems unusually tight. Is there a reason for that?
>> 
>> Hi Mark  -
>> 
>> These timelines have evolved over a few years of running these RFPs. If you know of someone who would bid, but needs more time, please let us know and we can extend them.
>> 
>>> 
>>> I ask because having such short timelines can severely impact participation.
>> So far, it hasn't appeared to. We've let some run much longer in the past, and the bids we got were from people that told us they would bid very early on. Again, if you know of someone who's looking but is bothered by the short turnarounds, let us know.
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT mailing list
>>> TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-development
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT mailing list
>> TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-development
> 
> --
> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
>