Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] Revised Question: Can we move the tools team meetings a half hour later
Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Wed, 31 March 2021 14:36 UTC
Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29EEC3A2AB1 for <tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 07:36:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EsBU6FCajIjX for <tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 07:36:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA36E3A2A89 for <tools-development@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 07:36:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FD8D300BBD for <tools-development@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 10:36:17 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 7CLH-yZs0ewb for <tools-development@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 10:36:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.161] (pool-141-156-161-153.washdc.fios.verizon.net [141.156.161.153]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2835B300B19; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 10:36:15 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.17\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <5ea11455-0b43-71e4-b1cc-6f6012768223@nostrum.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 10:36:16 -0400
Cc: IETF Tools Development <tools-development@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <16C8EE9B-EE1E-4453-A6EA-AA81C2CFB689@vigilsec.com>
References: <5ea11455-0b43-71e4-b1cc-6f6012768223@nostrum.com>
To: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.17)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-development/WwrmXL4TBz6yekrQKfDdwBw70fE>
Subject: Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] Revised Question: Can we move the tools team meetings a half hour later
X-BeenThere: tools-development@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Tools Development mail list <tools-development.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-development>, <mailto:tools-development-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-development/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-development@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-development-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-development>, <mailto:tools-development-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 14:36:26 -0000
that is better than the current time. I may be late on occasion. Russ > On Mar 31, 2021, at 10:17 AM, Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> wrote: > > Based on direct feedback from a few people, a full hour later adds difficulty. A half hour later adds less. (And earlier would not be reasonable for NZ). > > So - would a half hour later be acceptable? > > RjS >
- [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] Revised Question: Can we move… Robert Sparks
- Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] Revised Question: Can we … Russ Housley
- Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] Revised Question: Can we … Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] Revised Question: Can we … Robert Sparks