Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] Getting a list of recently adopted document

[Greg Wood <[e-mail]>]

> On May 16, 2019, at 3:39 PM, Robert Sparks <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> 
> On 5/16/19 2:05 PM, Roman Danyliw wrote:
>> Hi Robert!
>> 
>> Greg has the vision here.  I thought it was more of a report that would be cherry-picked into other channels like Twitter, the web-site.  I didn't think it was another mailing list.
>> 
>> Greg: right?  I don't think we discussed how this information would be delivered.
> Alternatives include a subscription feed or direct email to some address.

Specific delivery modes discussed by the IESG Comms review group included an email list called something like [e-mail]. I don’t know whether the list name has been confirmed.

A Twitter feed similar to https://twitter.com/rfcbot (https://github.com/bradleyfalzon/rfc-bot) and https://twitter.com/rfcdujour (https://github.com/exponential-decay/rfc-du-jour) called something like @ietf-new was also discussed.

-Greg

>> 
>> Roman
>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Robert Sparks [mailto:[e-mail]]
>>> Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2019 2:41 PM
>>> To: Roman Danyliw <[e-mail]>
>>> Cc: [e-mail]
>>> Subject: Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] Getting a list of recently adopted
>>> document
>>> 
>>> Another thread to pick up -
>>> 
>>> Have you decided on the "channels" below? What I'd heard from Spencer
>>> was that we'd have a new list and other things could feed off that list.
>>> Do we need more? If not, has the IESG chosen a list name?
>>> 
>>> RjS
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 5/2/19 1:14 PM, Roman Danyliw wrote:
>>>> Hi Rob!
>>>> 
>>>> Sorry for the long delay.  I missed you response.
>>>> 
>>>> You have it right.  The interest would be for the IETF WG stream only.
>>>> 
>>>> Roman
>>>> 
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT [mailto:tools-development-
>>> [e-mail]]
>>>>> On Behalf Of Robert Sparks
>>>>> Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2019 9:43 AM
>>>>> To: [e-mail]
>>>>> Subject: Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] Getting a list of recently adopted
>>>>> document
>>>>> 
>>>>> It would not be hard to build, and Spencer gave us very early warning
>>>>> on the idea, so it's mostly thought through already.
>>>>> 
>>>>> But we need to be sure we build what's really wanted, and advertise
>>>>> it correctly.
>>>>> 
>>>>> As stated, you want this list to be only _IETF_ WG adoptions, correct?
>>>>> We would not include IRTF RG adoptions (or IAB or any other stream),
>>>>> correct?
>>>>> 
>>>>> RjS
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 4/11/19 6:29 AM, Roman Danyliw wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Tools Team!
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I'm helping Greg Wood launch an "IETF Notifications of Emerging Work"
>>>>> project.  The thinking is we'd like to have a way to easily summarize
>>>>> new work the IETF is starting.  To make this tractable, "new work"
>>>>> has been defined as all of the drafts that have been recently adopted
>>>>> per a given look- back period by a WG (i.e., draft-ietf-<wg name>-*-00).
>>>>>> The channels in which this would be summarized/announced is yet to
>>>>>> be
>>>>> determined, but the raw data required per -00 draft is the draft
>>>>> name, WG, title, and abstract.
>>>>>> Doing this manually wouldn't be feasible, so we were looking for
>>>>>> assistance
>>>>> with automation.  How far off is such a regular report from something
>>>>> that already exists?
>>>>>> Roman
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT mailing list
>>>>>> [e-mail]
>>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-development
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT mailing list
>>>>> [e-mail]
>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-development