Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] Hello tools-development

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Tue, 09 April 2019 19:31 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E77A120316 for <tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Apr 2019 12:31:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.979
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.979 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mVonG47OLhv9 for <tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Apr 2019 12:31:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 026AF1203F5 for <tools-development@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Apr 2019 12:31:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unescapeable.local ([47.186.39.7]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x39JV1dI005145 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for <tools-development@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Apr 2019 14:31:02 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1554838262; bh=AKIX4AOYVIukzzgC6LAbNrPzBwaZGZ4sUHV41kK9fS4=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=KqzvxvXmtr98sQw5PfFe960PcB41+3oj2qIGe4sDtsXUbaHjne6fL3KhOqQFYKYDc BOXEa562slynzRsYpFTmCsl76azx5BXJjreIChL7C/lbXLBRxEhrP+PiUPvMci5HbQ z0CRMKevtaH+51Wmwh8pDuFHEmt7WkpuKSWgD4Ts=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.39.7] claimed to be unescapeable.local
To: tools-development@ietf.org
References: <B3F5CCFE-F252-4157-B125-523EDB282579@mnot.net>
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <e57ef465-91f1-00c8-2779-101e7b2a103c@nostrum.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 14:31:01 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <B3F5CCFE-F252-4157-B125-523EDB282579@mnot.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-development/ecWKbrNNzyl9wm5IWat2rXEv6p0>
Subject: Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] Hello tools-development
X-BeenThere: tools-development@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Tools Development list server <tools-development.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-development>, <mailto:tools-development-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-development/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-development@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-development-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-development>, <mailto:tools-development-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2019 19:31:06 -0000

On 4/8/19 6:48 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I've just joined the tools-development team, and hope I can add some value; I have some background in systems administration and web ops.
>
> I'm just getting up to speed (and would love any pointers to help in that process!), but one immediate question -- in the RFP that just went out, the timeline seems unusually tight. Is there a reason for that?

Hi Mark  -

These timelines have evolved over a few years of running these RFPs. If 
you know of someone who would bid, but needs more time, please let us 
know and we can extend them.

>
> I ask because having such short timelines can severely impact participation.
So far, it hasn't appeared to. We've let some run much longer in the 
past, and the bids we got were from people that told us they would bid 
very early on. Again, if you know of someone who's looking but is 
bothered by the short turnarounds, let us know.
>
> Cheers,
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
>
> _______________________________________________
> TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT mailing list
> TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-development