Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] Tools call Tuesday 9 Feb at 1900 UTC
Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Thu, 04 February 2021 21:13 UTC
Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA6033A183A for <tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 13:13:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.08
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.08 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gMnZP04msG4n for <tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 13:13:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C05D3A115E for <tools-development@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 13:13:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from unformal.localdomain ([47.186.1.92]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPSA id 114LDTWr029498 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 4 Feb 2021 15:13:30 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1612473210; bh=H2Qq1taS6e14nfosCKYiqXUtBohhK3dwXkdDLnT7YC4=; h=To:Cc:References:From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To; b=kmLvq1URsYnfALAadBWXY+zr1MdM8xp/NsLw1OtCBXo2nteifr1gthAUNtWS5e77n wzqtClKnfwR1H+iw6TbayFUFG3F1pMumbIPsALQIqQlPRn6aKQC41tlTQdpPHNpZo0 kOEOOnXYxHl6Jyy1DnqyLx+NFyblp68agJbZYaQc=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.1.92] claimed to be unformal.localdomain
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Cc: IETF Tools Development <tools-development@ietf.org>
References: <9ac7721d-4e78-7e51-5807-27ad9114671b@nostrum.com> <D54D2FF1-A79A-4559-86D6-A8D0FB191DCD@vigilsec.com>
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <5365afb1-d6c7-a4ff-bca3-70ce8ada008f@nostrum.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2021 15:13:24 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <D54D2FF1-A79A-4559-86D6-A8D0FB191DCD@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-development/ethCx-oYFRJQ1nzN7zDqEw-MfiA>
Subject: Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] Tools call Tuesday 9 Feb at 1900 UTC
X-BeenThere: tools-development@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Tools Development mail list <tools-development.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-development>, <mailto:tools-development-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-development/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-development@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-development-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-development>, <mailto:tools-development-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2021 21:13:33 -0000
On 2/4/21 2:10 PM, Russ Housley wrote: > The agenda includes: Moving essential services from tools.ietf.org > > I am glad to see this. We used to talk about moving "mission critical" tools from tools.ietf.org to Secretariat operation. Is this subtle change is wording intended to convey a difference? No, not really. The things that need to move have been known for some time - we're just adding some focus on finishing the move, with Henrik's help. I'll try to add a bit more detail in the call notes, but the kinds of things we're talking about: * Finishing using the datatracker to serve the htmlized drafts (this is closer to done that I remembered - we're down to some styling and building links at the top of the page using datatracker data) * Moving the source code repositories and trac instances to the secretiariat. (And making sure we don't have any other trac instances we've missed - we found the BoF wiki still needs to move) * Finish gathering what we need to inform building a replacement for the current xml2rfc and bibxml services * Moving the code that builds developer database snapshots > > Years ago, the IAOC Tools Management Committee was the group that determine whether a particular tool was "mission critical" or not. Who has that responsibility now? I think this group should point out any that we've not moved already and are not listed above. > > Russ > > >> On Feb 4, 2021, at 2:49 PM, Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> wrote: >> >> We have a tools call next Tuesday. >> >> Coordinates and an outline of the agenda are available at >> >> <https://codimd.ietf.org/tools-team-20210209#> >> >> *Given the confusion on start time at the last couple of sessions, please carefully check the stated time and make sure your calendars agree * >> >> The calendar is at https://calendar.google.com/calendar/ical/ietf.org_g4f732f5cdhl2to81jis83ch9s%40group.calendar.google.com/public/basic.ics >> >> Please bash the agenda - feel free to add topics if needed. >> >> I will be adding detail tomorrow. If you have content to share, adding it earlier is better than later. >> >> RjS
- [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] Tools call Tuesday 9 Feb at 1… Robert Sparks
- Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] Tools call Tuesday 9 Feb … Russ Housley
- Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] Tools call Tuesday 9 Feb … Robert Sparks