Robert Sparks <> Tue, 26 February 2019 16:07 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id D56B6128CB7; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 08:07:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.68
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.68 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)"
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LTTC_X5FocME; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 08:07:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80BC21276D0; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 08:07:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from unescapeable.local ([]) (authenticated bits=0) by (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x1QG7ipB065987 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 26 Feb 2019 10:07:44 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple;; s=default; t=1551197267; bh=Z47pC/PKF+6q+3TFPXpU6HgPGrBC5i4jLupU5xnaYgY=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=KfWJTjb9qPn/6ZOkZEQdDM6gHn4aC2XVFxgOkWCtBP7reZXAFHusPUyQvvvEsxJ6K F0HcWVYWuvPAFyubU3N4zNq5uj5H54prH/I7CITRWMZ21BDR1GNcqZFLuMyltFsmDN yYZvP8sIpTTE+K05deBofqAByPcs4QimgsOE1lCY=
X-Authentication-Warning: Host [] claimed to be unescapeable.local
To: Russ Housley <>, Portia Wenze-Danley <>
Cc: IETF Tools Development <>
References: <>
From: Robert Sparks <>
Message-ID: <>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 10:07:43 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------217F8F1EF73390B8907B2BCE"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] Idea about the IDIQ
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Tools Development list server <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 16:07:52 -0000

In particular, we could add that to the cover for the meeting app RFP, 
which I believe at this point is ready to go.

The latest version (removing the statistics paragraph as discussed on 
the last tools call) is attached.


On 2/25/19 5:37 PM, Russ Housley wrote:
> Portia:
> I have an idea.  Tell me if you like it or not.
> We could add to the cover that any responder to this RFP should indicate whether they are also interested in becoming an IDIQ contractor, and that we will use this projects response as the example rather than the one currently pointed to in the outstanding IDIQ RFP.
> I would think that the winning bidder is qualified, so they should be added to the IDIQ pool if they are interested.  Also, the other bidders can be evaluated for possible addition to the IDIQ pool.
> Russ
> _______________________________________________
> TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT mailing list