Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] tools issue? was Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-server-cookies-00.txt

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Mon, 09 September 2019 14:19 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D492C120801 for <tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 07:19:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N6NCAuNQ2cqq for <tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 07:19:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E752F1207FF for <tools-development@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 07:19:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5743F300B15 for <tools-development@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 10:19:53 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id QSds7RZoR89H for <tools-development@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 10:19:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from a860b60074bd.fios-router.home (unknown [138.88.156.37]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 294BA3005D5; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 10:19:51 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1909090954540.4992@bofh.nohats.ca>
Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2019 10:19:51 -0400
Cc: Willem Toorop <willem@nlnetlabs.nl>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>, IETF Tools Development <tools-development@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <DB1D90A9-FB29-401F-9ED8-9700F99E0F9E@vigilsec.com>
References: <156802477017.28268.17780089460480647573@ietfa.amsl.com> <86ff56cd-c936-0a81-b276-f4fd61635c7f@nlnetlabs.nl> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1909090848430.8758@bofh.nohats.ca> <97f8b8fb-91ad-ca74-b65b-d82698517203@nlnetlabs.nl> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1909090954540.4992@bofh.nohats.ca>
To: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-development/hBFwDngfXWMQ43RMGG8AqViMR04>
Subject: Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] tools issue? was Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-server-cookies-00.txt
X-BeenThere: tools-development@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Tools Development list server <tools-development.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-development>, <mailto:tools-development-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-development/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-development@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-development-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-development>, <mailto:tools-development-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2019 14:19:57 -0000

Paul:

The replaces and replaced-by information comes from the submitter.  In this case:

	Set submitter to "Willem Toorop <willem@nlnetlabs.nl>", replaces to draft-sury-toorop-dnsop-server-cookies, draft-eastlake-dnsop-server-cookies


>> Oh, sorry.  I indicated that it replaced the previous draft (and
>> Donald's) that is not correct?
> 
> That normally ensures the datatracker does the tracking and the diffs,
> but it does not look like that happened for this document. It appears
> as a fresh submit without any history. Even weirder, it seems that the
> old document indeed got the update reference:
> 
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sury-toorop-dnsop-server-cookies-00
> 
> but the new document does not link back to the old one and misses the
> diff.
> 
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-server-cookies-00
> 
> I CC:ed the tools team on this who might be able to see/fix what happened?

It looks like there are four drafts in the replaced-by history:

	draft-sury-toorop-dns-cookies-algorithms
	draft-sury-toorop-dnsop-server-cookies
	draft-eastlake-dnsop-server-cookies
	draft-ietf-dnsop-server-cookies

The history tab of draft-ietf-dnsop-server-cookies shows all four, allowing the comparison of the last one to any of the earlier ones.

Russ