[TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] Fwd: Errata Processing Stats/Queue?

Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Thu, 08 August 2019 13:46 UTC

Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55669120044 for <tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 06:46:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cooperw.in header.b=vpMkjuyz; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=Llptc9t1
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rzUVxyAX1R9O for <tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 06:46:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 754681200B6 for <tools-development@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 06:46:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id E129D242; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 09:46:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 08 Aug 2019 09:46:48 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h= from:content-type:mime-version:subject:date:references:cc:to :message-id; s=fm3; bh=3k60ppsgPly/Q93nsO1/2F1Wa3cdCVOrFQJhsKDrf DI=; b=vpMkjuyzz9Ut4xRziEYZjNZu08eVH7Udl5ezgf7hH5UODcbmu1H4eg/v0 2W0YfAun7kuEFGDujj4bayOVIduX2qMwiYcWXf3+pjZvnq1Yr0+JhHukCskU4O6A +k0CIxWMEP/1T3gKT8fnPeBz0OhXBElGv4h+5slZM8J1DaaG8kONdeoM1aClsO1f fGKReIbAUdnCaCrrSCd9bWgy9ifBW3N7I7KjNj3inKS1wC1+nAXsOZg45Vi5SI3n yJhaZQesta/3aJr+y+evG4GF91EhwbKcdVGgpx0Una4FmANdRS7aO1WTSBCgy7Qq aq+5seEplfbD03xz9A+HEWv0DhIsA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=3k60ppsgPly/Q93ns O1/2F1Wa3cdCVOrFQJhsKDrfDI=; b=Llptc9t14Zwdj3DEtmLZ8NNKBoNfKsw6q M4jkNhYLS/dlsveAGoQddOx/EaVc4ePUxCZoM3w/EdkkeCyGXJK6+x5ZN+CtLd9W oSnFRUQooChL7hHQ3u+0f7CoaztdyxcbHZR5lzT3+2X4UNUSZ3+2gvtWATxSq2kw Zc06swc6t2RaFIh0im02303aq8Y6RCOBssRKrNeNhHNm4vyGUgAqa+xzzSuZOTH+ uaflBbwsJm7OaH4pHSWNQVZVj6B08D9Us6WPET8LBAKATEhePoy27BHfHbI9EjIx 8sTHQabkyNQ+gg46k66Wq0BPwq9vA7vqFmNfA9KZLEXQb4jIcX6LQ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:xidMXcARyQ7YqIrL0orFU2Rg-gIQxjd6Me4hgc_wmQXMf-bvcG3vkw>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduvddrudduhedgieekucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephfgtggfuffhfvffkofesrgdtmherhhdtvdenucfhrhhomheptehlihhsshgr ucevohhophgvrhcuoegrlhhishhsrgestghoohhpvghrfidrihhnqeenucffohhmrghinh eprhhftgdqvgguihhtohhrrdhorhhgpdhivghtfhdrohhrghenucfkphepudejfedrfeek rdduudejrdejfeenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheprghlihhsshgrsegtohhoph gvrhifrdhinhenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:xidMXZ9cJR10aE8IK51mPGHM_aR8MjF74seBlWVekly1d9UQRUL4SA> <xmx:xidMXTFdnsa3MiqT3izYP9Ztfs8tW8rDw3NnVHtRS4awIX-toxZacw> <xmx:xidMXXOagFsnuLd4vfUrTeD98bZ-TK1__y7116jcJPKq9YnTkW-5Yg> <xmx:xydMXar56wci2n7zCYGl5UU2BZdzRUPlyW3UtIALxkWmEGi8IR3S9w>
Received: from rtp-alcoop-nitro2.cisco.com (unknown [173.38.117.73]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D8CE680066; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 09:46:45 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_C484BD24-950F-4257-97A8-0EA212D29834"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2019 09:46:44 -0400
References: <8164720c-383b-8e3b-5b71-bb120fea0e77@nostrum.com>
To: IETF Tools Development <tools-development@ietf.org>, Heather Flanagan <rse@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <9C1F0619-2CD5-4532-B6B0-BEF8D98709EA@cooperw.in>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-development/hDrbqpGFI0HS0IruYwYFm7SJRQ4>
Subject: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] Fwd: Errata Processing Stats/Queue?
X-BeenThere: tools-development@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Tools Development list server <tools-development.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-development>, <mailto:tools-development-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-development/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-development@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-development-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-development>, <mailto:tools-development-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2019 13:46:50 -0000

Robert, Heather, all,

(+ Adam since he did the PoC)

Is there a reason not to deploy the in-line errata display on datatracker.ietf.org and tools.ietf.org RFC versions in addition to rfc-editor.org RFCs? From the start when we were discussing this project and working out the budget for it I thought the plan was to deploy in all three places.

Thanks,
Alissa


> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
> Subject: Re: Errata Processing Stats/Queue?
> Date: August 7, 2019 at 11:30:21 AM EDT
> To: ietf@ietf.org
> 
> 
> On 8/7/19 9:52 AM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 06:13:08AM -0700, Eric Rescorla wrote:
>>> Dear IESG: can you report on the status of that project and when the
>>> tools/datatracker sites will show inline errata?
>> My understanding is that the code is done and waiting to be deployed.
>> 
>> Alissa's note at
>> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/QDuj5ItTcY5nbVQVp7FMRjZiSZY may
>> be the most authoritative thing I can point to right now.
> 
> This is currently in the rfc-editor's hands (as their plan is to deploy it on the rfc-editor website).
> 
> RjS
> 
>> 
>> -Ben
>> 
>