Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] Fwd: Errata Processing Stats/Queue?
Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Thu, 08 August 2019 13:52 UTC
Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F8FF1200B6 for <tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 06:52:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.978
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nhFFi3SjEFmv for <tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 06:52:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 604EA120044 for <tools-development@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 06:52:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unescapeable.local ([47.186.30.41]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x78DqLBb078131 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for <tools-development@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 08:52:21 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1565272342; bh=YwOjAb5asaXBneOPnINEanjg9qDMoCbPVZNPE7sv4oI=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=bwzdhMapLNen1cOq1ocw1fRXAuR4gjQqaIRWiEWVVrGAzx9T9nejK2x2z9Oc4jChv qu2HobqPn4bgoFUuB5YF8CZNsx/LLCqQ4GOcUMJErBp3jLAksaVYJPQtqQmBrfHj/+ aAM7XoLs1oCw07MwlKsF/eqnDn5dLdWXdElNwdso=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.30.41] claimed to be unescapeable.local
To: tools-development@ietf.org
References: <8164720c-383b-8e3b-5b71-bb120fea0e77@nostrum.com> <9C1F0619-2CD5-4532-B6B0-BEF8D98709EA@cooperw.in>
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <4954fac2-085d-69ea-c38e-9ea36e01ea7b@nostrum.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2019 08:52:20 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <9C1F0619-2CD5-4532-B6B0-BEF8D98709EA@cooperw.in>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------C80CF2D281CEDCBA108AD704"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-development/tsuZIKMgy6ONL9MumoU9_31h4Nk>
Subject: Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] Fwd: Errata Processing Stats/Queue?
X-BeenThere: tools-development@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Tools Development list server <tools-development.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-development>, <mailto:tools-development-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-development/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-development@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-development-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-development>, <mailto:tools-development-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2019 13:52:27 -0000
I am currently expecting that datatracker and tools would link to the rfc-editor pages once deployed. (From what I've heard from Heather, that deployment should be very soon). RjS On 8/8/19 8:46 AM, Alissa Cooper wrote: > Robert, Heather, all, > > (+ Adam since he did the PoC) > > Is there a reason not to deploy the in-line errata display on > datatracker.ietf.org <http://datatracker.ietf.org> and tools.ietf.org > <http://tools.ietf.org> RFC versions in addition to rfc-editor.org > <http://rfc-editor.org> RFCs? From the start when we were discussing > this project and working out the budget for it I thought the plan was > to deploy in all three places. > > Thanks, > Alissa > > >> Begin forwarded message: >> >> *From: *Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com >> <mailto:rjsparks@nostrum.com>> >> *Subject: **Re: Errata Processing Stats/Queue?* >> *Date: *August 7, 2019 at 11:30:21 AM EDT >> *To: *ietf@ietf.org <mailto:ietf@ietf.org> >> >> >> On 8/7/19 9:52 AM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: >>> On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 06:13:08AM -0700, Eric Rescorla wrote: >>>> Dear IESG: can you report on the status of that project and when the >>>> tools/datatracker sites will show inline errata? >>> My understanding is that the code is done and waiting to be deployed. >>> >>> Alissa's note at >>> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/QDuj5ItTcY5nbVQVp7FMRjZiSZY >>> may >>> be the most authoritative thing I can point to right now. >> >> This is currently in the rfc-editor's hands (as their plan is to >> deploy it on the rfc-editor website). >> >> RjS >> >>> >>> -Ben >>> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT mailing list > TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-development
- [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] Fwd: Errata Processing Stats/… Alissa Cooper
- Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] Fwd: Errata Processing St… Robert Sparks
- Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] Errata Processing Stats/Q… Alissa Cooper