Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] Fwd: Errata Processing Stats/Queue?

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Thu, 08 August 2019 13:52 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F8FF1200B6 for <tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 06:52:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.978
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nhFFi3SjEFmv for <tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 06:52:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 604EA120044 for <tools-development@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 06:52:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unescapeable.local ([47.186.30.41]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x78DqLBb078131 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for <tools-development@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 08:52:21 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1565272342; bh=YwOjAb5asaXBneOPnINEanjg9qDMoCbPVZNPE7sv4oI=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=bwzdhMapLNen1cOq1ocw1fRXAuR4gjQqaIRWiEWVVrGAzx9T9nejK2x2z9Oc4jChv qu2HobqPn4bgoFUuB5YF8CZNsx/LLCqQ4GOcUMJErBp3jLAksaVYJPQtqQmBrfHj/+ aAM7XoLs1oCw07MwlKsF/eqnDn5dLdWXdElNwdso=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.30.41] claimed to be unescapeable.local
To: tools-development@ietf.org
References: <8164720c-383b-8e3b-5b71-bb120fea0e77@nostrum.com> <9C1F0619-2CD5-4532-B6B0-BEF8D98709EA@cooperw.in>
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <4954fac2-085d-69ea-c38e-9ea36e01ea7b@nostrum.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2019 08:52:20 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <9C1F0619-2CD5-4532-B6B0-BEF8D98709EA@cooperw.in>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------C80CF2D281CEDCBA108AD704"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-development/tsuZIKMgy6ONL9MumoU9_31h4Nk>
Subject: Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] Fwd: Errata Processing Stats/Queue?
X-BeenThere: tools-development@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Tools Development list server <tools-development.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-development>, <mailto:tools-development-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-development/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-development@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-development-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-development>, <mailto:tools-development-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2019 13:52:27 -0000

I am currently expecting that datatracker and tools would link to the 
rfc-editor pages once deployed. (From what I've heard from Heather, that 
deployment should be very soon).

RjS

On 8/8/19 8:46 AM, Alissa Cooper wrote:
> Robert, Heather, all,
>
> (+ Adam since he did the PoC)
>
> Is there a reason not to deploy the in-line errata display on 
> datatracker.ietf.org <http://datatracker.ietf.org> and tools.ietf.org 
> <http://tools.ietf.org> RFC versions in addition to rfc-editor.org 
> <http://rfc-editor.org> RFCs? From the start when we were discussing 
> this project and working out the budget for it I thought the plan was 
> to deploy in all three places.
>
> Thanks,
> Alissa
>
>
>> Begin forwarded message:
>>
>> *From: *Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com 
>> <mailto:rjsparks@nostrum.com>>
>> *Subject: **Re: Errata Processing Stats/Queue?*
>> *Date: *August 7, 2019 at 11:30:21 AM EDT
>> *To: *ietf@ietf.org <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
>>
>>
>> On 8/7/19 9:52 AM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 06:13:08AM -0700, Eric Rescorla wrote:
>>>> Dear IESG: can you report on the status of that project and when the
>>>> tools/datatracker sites will show inline errata?
>>> My understanding is that the code is done and waiting to be deployed.
>>>
>>> Alissa's note at
>>> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/QDuj5ItTcY5nbVQVp7FMRjZiSZY 
>>> may
>>> be the most authoritative thing I can point to right now.
>>
>> This is currently in the rfc-editor's hands (as their plan is to 
>> deploy it on the rfc-editor website).
>>
>> RjS
>>
>>>
>>> -Ben
>>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT mailing list
> TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-development