Re: [Tools-discuss] Meeting support for contributors

[Michael Richardson <[e-mail]>]

Carsten Bormann <[e-mail]> wrote:
    > — agenda documents don’t have a defined way to summon me: CB, cabo,
    > Carsten, C. Bormann, …

The DT has a way to indicate who needs to be present, as a clue to the scheduler.
But, I don't think that works right.

    > - agenda documents don’t have a defined way to list an I-D (some don’t
    > give even the full draft-ietf-foo-bar name) — well, datatracker has a
    > way to record that information outside the agenda document now, but
    > very few WGs are taking advantage of that capability (statistics?).

Chairs can indicate which documents are on which agenda, and I think that the
DT could tell you this.  Chairs are not doing this frequently yet.

    > — datatracker does not know which Internet-Drafts are
    > “important-for-me” (which is probably not a boolean quality either).

Yeah.  This is the hard part.

I take it that you are trying to make sure you are present where you need to
be.

--
Michael Richardson <[e-mail]>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide