Re: [Tools-discuss] matrix tests
Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca> Sun, 13 December 2020 20:57 UTC
Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4F8B3A0980 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Dec 2020 12:57:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u8IU5zxwooTg for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Dec 2020 12:57:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01A543A097E for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Dec 2020 12:57:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 643FC38988; Sun, 13 Dec 2020 15:59:44 -0500 (EST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id HlvckGiLfXaO; Sun, 13 Dec 2020 15:59:43 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26D0338984; Sun, 13 Dec 2020 15:59:43 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A2BE5D1; Sun, 13 Dec 2020 15:57:12 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
cc: tools-discuss@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <e547d7be-8838-ce7f-fad5-61af474f7d12@cs.tcd.ie>
References: <e547d7be-8838-ce7f-fad5-61af474f7d12@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2020 15:57:12 -0500
Message-ID: <15081.1607893032@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/1-jU6tOvDDimEt7dxFTTBJO_qYM>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] matrix tests
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2020 20:57:17 -0000
Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> wrote: > It didn't occur to me to create any matrix rooms. If it had, I'm not > sure if that'd have been useful but I can imagine it being so in > future, e.g. for a bar bof. Before that'd be a standard procedure I'd > like to understand the duration for which any such rooms might last, > how closed/open they may be etc. It would be interesting if we could get some kind of convergence between gather.town and such rooms. > I think the main feature in matrix clients that I like that beats > jabber is the ability to edit messages after they've been sent. I'm not > sure how that'd pan out with the jabber logs, but am happy to do a test > if that's useful. I'm also happy to connect and play about in general > if that's helpful, just ping me. I feel the urge to edit your text above and see if you notice :-) > Whatever experiments are done, I think an equivalent to the jabber logs > will be needed if matrix or another scheme is to be used for more than > experiments. Of all the available technologies, I feel that a seemless transition towards matrix pleases me the most. -- ] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [ ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | IoT architect [ ] mcr@sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
- [Tools-discuss] matrix tests Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Tools-discuss] matrix tests Michael Richardson
- Re: [Tools-discuss] matrix tests Matthew Wild
- Re: [Tools-discuss] matrix tests Glen
- Re: [Tools-discuss] matrix tests Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Tools-discuss] matrix tests Michael Richardson
- Re: [Tools-discuss] matrix tests Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Tools-discuss] matrix tests Matthew Hodgson