[Tools-discuss] Re: draft and author aliases VS SES
John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Thu, 04 July 2024 01:37 UTC
Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAB00C15107F for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jul 2024 18:37:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.858
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.858 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b="px6BdGTd"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b="xxa+bOYv"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id brbACV8XfNH4 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jul 2024 18:36:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCB52C15107C for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Jul 2024 18:36:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 49928 invoked from network); 4 Jul 2024 01:36:54 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=c3046685fcb6.k2407; bh=rzq6vPWw4V2OE1EjpLJQ9btr+iu42meuMgEOIiESZYQ=; b=px6BdGTdjaLDKR7d3bLieY5Ihj71ZeGoWnWIiIqIIgmaTQtgBnhj26O5kvPXERDW7bfRJKOV8BOzk16reU33IkBYAbIJd546sbUz/oC8bxTrWI5ZpgpImzzBM6pEs7kN25Q9+dPXrzl9v8zgYuXrDB+q2y5avgCBlOE0sL86dmbobK5WSGSUjuVph00qdC4N+8L3nQ9ji51n+FYgRHPrzvK6vjBvV48/hwvc6xXjXUKhBueHWKGMdO4lFBRdSN8UYWLmn5fMe9ihSd2NRBucJ8/sqkwcFAqjCDqylqU4vpPuC8IqtJfGTx0TuoqCY/Lb5FKMr0j792zXAvCdSWOLJA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=c3046685fcb6.k2407; bh=rzq6vPWw4V2OE1EjpLJQ9btr+iu42meuMgEOIiESZYQ=; b=xxa+bOYvND5SUxNbSSnAbUyqjjVZKmUHPBdi2tYYCkNqTj++hz2Uh/5W+8/Th6stmvNyO7b4znOIFTT3/U71xAQTGwDCJgHbrSY2kWEhl8mJk6aG2rW50D9AvDBBoW2b+NWMpmWqk7802CSiSQO6iDIIYGADzSVihbJUl9li8UljCj9MtRMpvGQDjIJxnlaOlfKtzwJ6mC3gJ5bI/QcOBIT5hJ+9k7AmhPgjY0a+PFXZN4L6jzrreePpmpd0+0LymgjpXK9DgkyxKno3mY1904iI2Ij85uw+bh36q8SuIj/jcfkyiEv5d0HRjUbbk/E74JOMKqQ7o3U686zCA28nfw==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.3 ECDHE-RSA CHACHA20-POLY1305 AEAD) via TCP6; 04 Jul 2024 01:36:54 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id 7E1308EBE502; Wed, 3 Jul 2024 21:36:52 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2024 21:36:52 -0400
Message-Id: <20240704013653.7E1308EBE502@ary.qy>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: tools-discuss@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <31445.1720042043@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
References: <31445.1720042043@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
X-Headerized: yes
Cleverness: minimal
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Message-ID-Hash: AOPFLNTXEFNGOKVPB7JSXCLW74VU6LL7
X-Message-ID-Hash: AOPFLNTXEFNGOKVPB7JSXCLW74VU6LL7
X-MailFrom: johnl@iecc.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tools-discuss.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [Tools-discuss] Re: draft and author aliases VS SES
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/1VMcKL8dut4rUb026yIv6q1WFHk>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tools-discuss-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tools-discuss-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tools-discuss-leave@ietf.org>
It appears that Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> said: > I don't know how (Amazon) SES works, .... >So I think that we can't switch over to SES until we have DMARC-safed all our >aliases, and I understood that was a post-mailman3 switch activity. Is there a reason you are guessing about this? Have you ever looked at the extensive SES online documentation? Do you believe that the people working on the mail transition are so unfamiliar with e-mail that they haven't considered this among many other possible issues? R's, John
- [Tools-discuss] draft and author aliases VS SES Michael Richardson
- [Tools-discuss] Re: draft and author aliases VS S… John Levine
- [Tools-discuss] Re: draft and author aliases VS S… Robert Sparks
- [Tools-discuss] Re: draft and author aliases VS S… John Levine