IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Tools-discuss] Re: Automated mail on call for adoption and working group last call

Rifaat Shekh-Yusef <rifaat.s.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 25 August 2025 13:13 UTC

Return-Path: <rifaat.s.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EA3458A1ED3; Mon, 25 Aug 2025 06:13:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JhwJQ3J3B3Ea; Mon, 25 Aug 2025 06:13:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x236.google.com (mail-lj1-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::236]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C01358A1ECC; Mon, 25 Aug 2025 06:13:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x236.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-33663b68b06so10452851fa.1; Mon, 25 Aug 2025 06:13:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1756127608; x=1756732408; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=SfWuC3o1XAYHiNmzjEx5hRbtvZlkVAGsiLgOaFt4CTo=; b=kvOEVb89ns7AiSUwq/i6QYMUKdCFVsL9avrGY2HIL+dDJmaRYAyQNDDqTq0NMWCpSU BOauczFyZ8jMfvyeNa/XhdeL0O2bSxkBqgg/Eghqv8JP7tf9mQ2XgPSH79rGJUOmIKfj UG52vaxyDL8vhf2Tr/fV50K5V/3WfA6J/Ex0tNNhy5l8LuZyzFdLO07L3D/yNPBhEvhx E/QU9r2wHq6nxfOlAR4dXaMaMv872oHstRZn5Zolj3xnif8CxYVjwdHgMQcOkizHFLPO qRGvAW3Xc9JlMQlhTeaoeST4eT9rWAPcYxup28CnJhNg4Qu4V6GIW9Px5Xr57UdhPG5p Kb/A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1756127608; x=1756732408; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=SfWuC3o1XAYHiNmzjEx5hRbtvZlkVAGsiLgOaFt4CTo=; b=CZ+VA+SgPOdWLeL4adSLG74n7x920xvJLqqIgqrhnm4q0GzfrfLabtErBmKIyh/T3s jY/GdyhpOhm3AwGNoFAXHWjDaOfaf4FEp3SetJBzFriqQm2SafgwhRG7ISahjD2VAnbw iQ3ZnMJMCYnQjyNmtsf6MdMKvPuyfB12AtuBeLTAm2n8iSIauib9wWomYT6KfTdRXk5H rsS2wJN8gYRA3TSWBKXU0TZSSFFHBPPWlZPtuBox8j3rhoX6Cj0XZ9C5cKGkFFe9oJV9 G5LbxOIsfr+fAolKYiDv9fdeu36E4vSbMvns/zoIi7UeROsEp7dzUH8Ozs4XE9MLxiUZ pb8Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxuApfYQHJAfZhiNriaYLXGf+CCX45Zku7x4xyUvi9NHOz9Mi/C q8yxT4c/Qy4W7Rq+Tj6qVU4wO7194iYMxZRjXiwsB5pBhy+TihCXsP0GAw7zEACt5eM+keKJEjd 8+BDEJt6Bwv455aDbPZGmTZhp19l5C5K2og==
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnctsGthS4GTm4zBJQSdUwI2vPg7fIVJkfNOVZEs6S91MaaisDxIIEAyZuXukojc ymRJoQa92oW/8TB/phehOgQH5GSIZLZSzzYku8n+xrPXWCjhlhDniuGViPZG/acm0S50M8QpGOx EgBFoEt521CI2vX9EBctyMhCRNGGOh6k51d8bgtEPo4D36uPIkSSA2pYqkw87M5ZnjIiyQTl2In dLrdMdLtOAE5PPHxZZd
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHG6mkBMRAtsOYg4sR5ixTWbnj3t0n+ZBYlksjos4RoAyo1mKFRIgR4Pjhodqb6MXJYL1ESteot50qOuTkW2io=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:b88d:0:b0:335:4478:171e with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-33650fc2879mr30682831fa.44.1756127607286; Mon, 25 Aug 2025 06:13:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <9420de32-95a4-4c50-b59a-b28bcefdca3a@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <9420de32-95a4-4c50-b59a-b28bcefdca3a@nostrum.com>
From: Rifaat Shekh-Yusef <rifaat.s.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2025 09:13:16 -0400
X-Gm-Features: Ac12FXzlTUMS9JoWDYi3WPTA7h2TRnvbAppkE3g8ghDxRO8OxVKXU0UUdnVCH8A
Message-ID: <CADNypP8WWdm-3CJOu2bTWUxbPwj1M+9+K7wTbHYcoQrGOMQGZA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tools Team Discussion <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000003671e9063d3052b7"
Message-ID-Hash: INSJ3FKVZV7UCIQX3RUWRANKKSI7FXJT
X-Message-ID-Hash: INSJ3FKVZV7UCIQX3RUWRANKKSI7FXJT
X-MailFrom: rifaat.s.ietf@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tools-discuss.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: "wgchairs@ietf.org" <wgchairs@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [Tools-discuss] Re: Automated mail on call for adoption and working group last call
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/1sERZC0P6MUWCFDK48y7lHCFU6c>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tools-discuss-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tools-discuss-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tools-discuss-leave@ietf.org>

Hi Robert,

This is great!

Sometimes, we need to issue a *second* WGLC. Is there a way to do that?

Regards,
 Rifaat


On Fri, Aug 22, 2025 at 6:23 PM Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> wrote:

> Chairs -
>
> The IESG asked that the datatracker send email automatically when a
> group puts a document into the WG state of "call for adoption issued" or
> "working group last call issued". That change was part of yesterday's
> datatracker deployment. It surprised at least one chair, for which I
> apologize.
>
> To see the details, look at
>
> https://github.com/ietf-tools/datatracker/issues/9142 (the request from
> the IESG)
>
> and
>
> https://github.com/ietf-tools/datatracker/pull/9322 (the PR from a
> volunteer that added the functionality).
>
> If you have use cases like the one Bob Hinden ran afoul of (going and
> adding the state to the datatracker long after the actual call had been
> issued) for which the current implementation will cause you trouble,
> please open an issue or send mail to tools-discuss. I'll make sure the
> IESG follows the discussion.
>
> RjS
>
>

v2.37.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status